Epstein Secrets

/2011 Page 10 of 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The foregoing document was served on March 21, 2011. on the following using the Court's CM/ECF system: A. Marie Villafafia Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 820-8711 Fax: (561) 820-8777 E-mail: ann.marie.c.lill

ave placed victims of Epstein's sexual abuse in "the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial." Declaration of Marie Villafana, July 9, 2008 (doc. #14) at 3-4. The affidavit also goes on to say that "these provisions were discussed," id. at 4, apparently referring to this

e of the unfounded allegations made against AUSA Villafana by Epstcin's counsel during the "higher level re

trict court had no authority under mandatory restitution act to reopen restitution proceedings after sentencing). More recently in the case °fin re Peterson, No. 2:10-CV-298, 2010 WL 5108692 (N.D. Ind. Dec. 8, 2010), the district court denied relief under the Crime Victims' Restitution Act before any ch

e from its prior Order. Defendant has not filed any response to the instant Motion, and a hearing was held on the same on March 13, 2007, at which Ann Marie C. Villafana, Esquire, AUSA (hereinafter "Villafana"), Andrew C. Lourie, Esquire, AUSA (hereinafter "Lourie"), and Patrick M. Hunt, Esquire, AFPD (hereinafter "

response to the instant Motion, and a hearing was held on the same on March 13, 2007, at which Ann Marie C. Villafana, Esquire, AUSA (hereinafter "Villafana"), Andrew C. Lourie, Esquire, AUSA (hereinafter "Lourie"), and Patrick M. Hunt, Esquire, AFPD (hereinafter "Hunt") 2 EFTA01657896 Case 9:06-cr-8

(citing United States v. Schaefer, 291 F.3d 932, 939-40 (7th Cir. 2002); United States v. Dove, 247 F.3d 152, 155 (4th Cir. 2001); United States v. Peterson, 101 F.3d 375, 385-86 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v. Dickler, 64 F.3d 818, 830- 31 (3d Cir. 1995)). 10 EFTA01657904 Case 9:06-cr-80058-WJZ Do

AL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Date of transcription 02/08/2008 On Thursday, January 31, 2008, COURTNEY WILD met with Assistant United States Attorney MARIE VILLAFANA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE (USAO) and Attorney MYESHA K. BRADEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF(JUSTICE(DOJ), CRIMINAL DIVISION. Also present a

met with Assistant United States Attorney MARIE VILLAFANA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE (USAO) and Atto

rict court had no authority under mandatory restitution act to reopen restitution proceedings after sentencing). More recently in the case of In re Peterson, No. 2:10-CV-298, 2010 WL 5108692 (N.D. Ind. Dec. 8, 2010), the district court denied relief under the Crime Victims' Rights Act before any charges

SERVICE LIST United States v. Adam G. McDaniel Case No. 06-80058-Cr-Zloch/Snow Andrew Lourie Assistant U.S. Attorney [email protected] A. Marie Villafaiia Assistant U.S. Attorney [email protected] U.S. Attorney's Office 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telep

the acts to constitute relevant conduct, the conduct must be criminal"); United States v. Dove, 247 F.3d 152, 155 (4th Cir. 2001); United States v. Peterson, 101 F.3d 375, 385 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v. Randall, 157 F.3d 328, 331 (5th Cir. 1998) (citing Peterson); United States v. Shafer, 199 F.3