Epstein Secrets

Miami Center Miami, ;bride 33131.4325 *Igeepl.n: :Fa. ziroi e: July 9, 2007 As 3i stant US Attorney S00 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 WI !st Palm Beach, Florida 33401 RE: Grand Jury Subpoena CASE NO. FGJ 07-103(WPB)/No. OLY-64 5501 SW Sunshine Farms Way Palm City, Florida 34990.5696 Telephona

09:28 PM M RS 30' 90189 P.02 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 g Australian Ave, Suite 400 Ware Palm Beach, FL 11401.6235 APPEARANCE NOTICE The attached subpoena requires the production of the records specified to a Federal Grand Jury/Trial in the South

re the Grand Jury of the United States District t the place, date and time specified below, United States District Courthouse 701 Clematis Street West Palm Bench, Florida 33401 ROOM: Grand Jury Room DATE AND TIME: March 13, 2007 1:00 pm• YOU ARE ALSO COMMANDED to bring with you the following document(s)

re to assure that [searches] are conducted in a manner that minimizes unwarranted intrusions upon privacy". West End, 321 F.Supp.2d at 960, quoting Andresen v. Maryland, 427 U.S. 463, 482 n.I I (1976). Most recently, in Warshak v. United States, 2007 WL 1730094 (6th Cir. June 18, 2007), the Sixth Circu

CKING FORM Party Filing Matter Under Seal On behalf of (select one): Name: JIM= u.S. Attorneys Office Address: 500 S. Australian Ave: Suite 400, Wesl Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: 0 Plaintiff O Defendant Date sealed document filed: 8/31/2007 If sealed pursuant to statute, cite statute: Fed. R. Grim. P.

ect copy of the forging motion was furnished by facsimile and U.S. mail to: Esq., U.S. Attorney's Office, 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400, West-Palm Beach, FL 33401. gC: 44 OS ROY BLACK, ESQ. Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein ?tit Ile...LeneA nein Black srcbmck. Kornsparl & Stumpf EFTA00179082 U.S.

nued validity of the broad statements contained in some of the Court's earlier cases [referring to Boyd], have been discredited by later opinions." Andresen v. Maryland, 427 U.S. 463, 472 (1976). In 1984, Justice O'Connor wrote a concurring opinion in United States v. Doe, 465 U.S. 605 (1984), just to m

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK This subpoena is issued upon application DATE: August 2, 2006 r of Assistant U.S. Attorney Australian 500 So Avenue, Suue West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6235 Tel: Fax: •.I not app Ca e, alter none." Case No.T084P07-36*V-MARRA RP036001)59 EFTA00228319 United States District Court SOU

ument's "seizure" only if during that brief perusal the document's "otherwise incriminating character becomes obvious." 668 F.2d at 1267. Heldt and Andresen do not address computers, and their guidance of "brief perusal" and "minimization of invasions of privacy" to a complete physical and logical foren