Epstein Secrets

Office, West Palm Bear& Flonda 33401 this 7* day of December. 2007. ATIERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Batch, Fleri • 33401 (56 9-8300 IA* LDBERGER, ESQUIRE Fl Bar No. 262013 co: The Honorable Sandra McSorley EFTA00214705 12/07/07 FRI 15:31 FAX 1 2

n another state. The travel must be for the purpose of engaging in the unlawful sexual act. See so Hansen v. Huff, 291 U.S. 559, 562-63 (1934) and Mortensen v. UnitekStates, 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944) ("An intention that the women or girls shall engage in the conduct outlawed by Section 2 must be found to

he State Grand Jury and never appeared. The defense neglects to point out that the subpoena was issued one or two days before JD#9 was to testify in West Palm Beach; she was living in Orlando at the time; and she was never served or told about the grand jury presentation. JD#9 admittedly has used drugs since bec

prove that the defendant's sole purpose for traveling and transporting the individual was to have the individual engage in illegal sexual activity. Mortensen. United States, 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944); Crespo I. United States, 151 F.2d 44, 46 (1st Cir. 1945). This offense carries a statutory maximum of ten

2006. Towards the end of 2006, Epstein's attorneys began making contact with the U.S. Attorney's Office to seek resolution of the case. A meeting in West Palm Beach was held with Epstein's attorneys in February 2007. Aftcr that meeting, the investigation continued, and an indictment package was prepared in May 2

cts, they travel for that purpose, is to emphasize that which is incidental and ignore what is of primary significance." Id. at 562-63. Likewise, in Mortensen'. United States 322 U.S. 369 (1944), defendants were convicted after two women they employed as prostitutes at their Nebraska brothel traveled to U

prove that the defendant's sole purpose for traveling and transporting the individual was to have the individual engage in illegal sexual activity. Mortensen v. United States, 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944); Crespo v. United States, 151 F.2d 44, 46 (1st Cir. 1945). This offense carries a statutory maximum of t

he State Grand Jury and never appeared. The defense neglects to point out that the subpoena was issued one or two days before JD#6 was to testify in West Palm Beach; she was living in Orlando at the time; and she was never served or told about the grand jury presentation. JD#6 admittedly has used drugs since bec