Epstein Secrets

and placed in the public portion of the court file O Destroyed 0 Returned to the party or counsel for the party, as identified above A`tancy for: United Stales of Vifierica EFTA00179092 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE: GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-64 AND

ry on September 18, 2007. However, 'Witness William Riley did not file an initial motion to quash the grand jury subpoenas, but did file a Reply to the United States' Response to the Intervenor's Motion to Quash. Accordingly, the United States has not previously had the opportunity to respond to the issue raised b

vestigation of these crimes involving the sexual exploitation of minors. The Supreme Court has routinely recognized the grand jury's unique role in the United States' criminal justice system. The grand jury "belongs to no branch of the institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Go

FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 FGJ 07-103(WPB) UNDER SEAL ORDER THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the United States of America's Motion for Permission to File a supplemental Ex Parte Affidavit in support of its Response to the Motion to Quash. Upon review of the motion, it i

84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 FGJ 07-103(WPB) UNITED STATES' SURREPLY TO REPLIES FILED BY WITNESS WILLIAM RILEY AND INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN RE: MOTION TO OUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS UNDER SEAL EFTA0017908

aterial) If sealed pursuant to previously entered protective order, date of order and docket entry number: The matter should remain sealed until: K Conclusion of Trial 0 Arrest of First Defendant O Case Closing 0 Conclusion of Direct Appeal ID Other: El Permanently. Specify the authorizing law, rule, court ord

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE: SEARCH WARRANT APPLICATION ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES' MOTION TO SEAL This matter comes before the Court upon the United States' Motion to Seal the documents related to its Search Warrant Application. The Court being fully apprised in the premises, orders that the motion is h

davit in support of an application by the United States of America for issuance of a warrant to search and seize evidence of violations of Title 18, United States Cod; Sections 371, 1591, 2252, 2252A, 2422, and 2423; instrumentalities of such violations; and any fruits of those crimes located within electronic me

Material) If sealed.pursuant to previously entered protective order, date of order and docket entry number: The matter should remain sealed until: K Conclusion of Trial 0 Arrest of First Defendant El Case Closing O Other: El Permanently. Specify the authorizing law, rule, court order: 0 Conclusion of Direct App

eized and promptly return this warrant to the duty Magistrate Judge as required by law. WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA City and State LINNEA R. JOHNSON United States Ma, 'strata Name and Title of Judicial Of EXHIBIT 13-120 EFTA00225133 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-8067-LRJ IN R

Investigation SEARCH WARRANT CASE NUMBER 08-8067-LRJ TO: E. NESBITT KUYRKENDALL, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION , and any Authorized Officer of the United States: Affidavit(s) having been made before me by E. Nesbitt Kuvrkendall who has reason to Alliant believe that E] on the person of or Ed on the prem

Material) If sealed pursuant to previously entered protective order, date of order and docket entry number: The matter should remain sealed until: K Conclusion of Trial 0 Arrest of First Defendant 1:1 Case Closing 0 Conclusion of Direct Appeal K Other: 0 Permanently. Specify the authorizing law, rule, court orde

etitioners' filings, DE48 and Exhibit A to DE48, only in redacted form. Attached hereto are the relevant portions of DE48 and Exhibit A to DE48 with the United States' proposed redactions. As explained in the United States' Response, the Petitioners do not oppose the redactions marked in blue. The Petitioners do o

tatute: If sealed pursuant to previously entered protective order, date of order and docket entry number: The matter should remain sealed until: K Conclusion of Trial K Case Closing Other: Further Order et the Court r4 K Arrest of First Defendant K Conclusion of Direct Appeal K Permanently. Specify the authorizi