Epstein Secrets

and placed in the public portion of the court file O Destroyed 0 Returned to the party or counsel for the party, as identified above A`tancy for: United Stales of Vifierica EFTA00179092 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE: GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-64 AND

ry on September 18, 2007. However, 'Witness William Riley did not file an initial motion to quash the grand jury subpoenas, but did file a Reply to the United States' Response to the Intervenor's Motion to Quash. Accordingly, the United States has not previously had the opportunity to respond to the issue raised b

vestigation of these crimes involving the sexual exploitation of minors. The Supreme Court has routinely recognized the grand jury's unique role in the United States' criminal justice system. The grand jury "belongs to no branch of the institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Go

FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 FGJ 07-103(WPB) UNDER SEAL ORDER THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the United States of America's Motion for Permission to File a supplemental Ex Parte Affidavit in support of its Response to the Motion to Quash. Upon review of the motion, it i

84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 FGJ 07-103(WPB) UNITED STATES' SURREPLY TO REPLIES FILED BY WITNESS WILLIAM RILEY AND INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN RE: MOTION TO OUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS UNDER SEAL EFTA0017908

IN RE: MOTION TO OUASII GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: 1. Both the witness and the intervenor ass

the grand jury on September 18, 2007. However, 'Witness did not file an initial motion to quash the grand jury subpoenas, but did file a Reply to the United States' Response to the Intervenor's Motion to Quash. Accordin 1 , the United States has not previously had the opportunity to respond to the issue raised b

DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM NUMBERS UNDER SEAL ORDER THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the United States of America's Motion for Permission to File a supplemental Ex Parte Affidavit in support of its Response to the Motion to Quash. Upon review of the motion, it i

DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE: GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL EX PARTE DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO MOTION TO OUASH UNDER SEAL EFTA01728796 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE: GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS UNDE

PSTEIN RE: ON TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witnessi and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: 1. Both the witness and the intervenor assert that wa

CT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 / FGJ 07-103(WPB) EX PARTE DECLARATION NUMBER TWO IN SUPPORT OF UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO MOTION TO OUASH SUBPOENAS FILED UNDER SEAL EFTA00179184 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY

uash Grand Jury Subpoenas and Cross-Motion to Compel ("Epstein Reply") at 5-8. 3 The government's effort at reductio ad absurdum is not well-taken. See United States' Surreply at 2 n.2. If the subpoenaed party's act ofproducing his mother's coffee cake recipe were potentially incriminating, then the act of produc

ny_info.Man 7/30/2007 EFTA00179203 Company Info Page 2 of 2 around the world. Mr. Kiraly works with numerous law firms and corporations within the United States and internationally on high profile, complicated litigation matters involving fraud, internal theft, asset location, and recovery as well as a broad

ITED STATES' SURREPLY TO REPLIES FILED BY WITNESS WILLIAM RILEY AND INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN RE: MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS I. In its Surreply, the government, for the first time, after the parties have filed numerous pleadings directed to the enforceability of the challenged subpoena, anno

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 FGJ 07-103(WPB) UNITED STATES' SURREPLY TO REPLIES FILED BY WITNESS WILLIAM RILEY AND INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN RE: MOTION TO OUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS UNDER SEAL EFTA0022297

grand jury on September 18, 2007. 'Witness William Riley did not file an initial motion to quash the grand jury subpoenas, but did file a Reply to the United States' Response to the Intervenor's Motion to Quash. Accordingly, the United States has not previously had the opportunity to respond to the issue raised

EIN RE: MOTION TO OUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor ass

of caution, the undersigned's general policy is to seek a search warrant for the contents of a computer once it is securely in custody, and that is the United States' intended approach in this case, as well. This procedure will allow the Court to decide whether adequate probable cause exists for the search of the

EIN RE: MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein, a and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor ass

UM NUMBERS FGJ 07-103 (WPB) OLY-64 AND OLY-64 / UNDER SEAL ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES' MOTION TO SEAL This matter comes before the Court upon the United States' Motion to Seal the documents related to its Surreply regarding the pending Motion to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas. The Court being fully apprised in t

ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES' MOTION TO SEAL This matter comes before the Court upon the United States' Motion to Seal the documents related to its Surreply regarding the pending Motion to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas. The Court being fully apprised in the premises, orders that the motion is hereby GRANTED

ed from Mr. Epstein's home. The grand jury probably has the authority to subpoena the contents of those computers, but, in an abundance of caution, the United States' intention is to seek a search warrant for the contents of those computers once the computers are securely in custody. This procedure will allow the

EIN RE: MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein, a and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor ass

stain the government's standing objection as to 'Witness did not file an initial motion to quash the grand jury subpoenas, but did file a Reply to the United States' Response to the Intervenor's Motion to Quash. Accordingly, the United States has not previously had the opportunity to respond to the issue raised

EIN RE: MOTION TO OUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor assert that was