Epstein Secrets

ners argue that the Court should accept their Statement as true, despite its conclusory allegations and internal inconsistencies, solely because of the United States' failure to stipulate to the Statement. The Court should deny the motion because: (1) Petitioners have misstated that United States' efforts at reach

to "completely and permanently obliterate and strike from the records of the pleas of guilty . . . any and all identifying reference to or name of Mt Smith, the Petitioner, so that such references may not be used as a public record to impugn the reputation of Petitioner." Id. at 1107. The Court further

re well aware that they received notifications of Epstein's work release status. EFTA00208507 CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth herein and in the United States' Response to Jane Does #1 and #2's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies

to "completely and permanently obliterate and strike from the records of the pleas of guilty . . . any and all identifying reference to or name of Mt Smith, the Petitioner, so that such references may not be used as a public record to impugn the reputation of Petitioner." Id. at 1107. The Court further

re well aware that they received notifications of Epstein's work release status. EFTA00212557 CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth herein and in the United States' Response to Jane Does #1 and #2's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies

to "completely and permanently obliterate and strike from the records of the pleas of guilty . . . any and all identifying reference to or name of Mt Smith, the Petitioner, so that such references may not be used as a public record to impugn the reputation of Petitioner." Id. at 1107. The Court further