Epstein Secrets

92.015 2006 08.16 ass ant history 3501092.016 2006.06.26 Palm Beach Polite Department Evidence/Property TrackingReport 3501092.017 2006.06.26 Palrn Beach Police Department properly receipt 3501092018 2006.0328 FBI memoranda." I etittlIntvICIIT asallancoproitram 3501092019 2006.09.29 Grand Jury transolpts WA 2021

060312 Florida DAV.I.D.Indisidui Summary PC 10, 3501414 003 2006.05.01 Pro0able Cause Affl0ave Regarding Milroy Epstein 3501.014O01 2006.07.13 Peen Beach Police Department incident Report 3501.014005 2006.0727 Florida DAVID. Individual Summary P br 3501.014006 2006.08.02 Law enforcement report for 3501.014007 2

.11 3501.160 Date Dosalpeen Attorney Produced to Defense 501.160001 tivoA91038 Misr ol documents for N.P. 2021.14.12 3501.1612084 006 07 Palm Police Department Mldmt reoon 2021.04.12 3501.160085 birth con to 2021.0132 3608161 Date Dosalption Attorney Produced to bl ew 3501.161 003 5020.0821 ween

1414'072 2008.05.19 Letter fromiPen Starr anti Joe Whitley 3501.014 073 Handesitten notes 3501.015 Date Descriptlea 3501.015.001 2006.07.13 Pad Beach Pence Department incident Report 3501415.002 2006.07.27 Florida DAVID. clover Icense tranwaten page Ice 3501415003 2006.08.02 Search retool fo 35014315011 200

riptaon 3501 134 COI 2005 11 16 Florida DAV I D indnidual summa f et Paul Lavwy 3501.07-037 2005.11.16 Florida DAVID. minsdual summary page for Paul Lavery 3501.134 033 3005.11.22 Leah Noels business report rout for Do Yotrutlf a Favor Inc 3501 I OM 3005.1.22 Leah Nexis person moon results for Pau

ctims identified. F2 Epstein's counsel is correct, however, in asserting that Epstein's criminal conduct first came to the attention of the FBI when the City of Palm Beach Police Department became concerned about the manner in which the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office was handling the state prosecution. The investigation of t

y have known about the United States' attempts to locate those computers for at least two months, when a subpoena for the same items was served upon Paul Lavery, another private investigator who worked with Riley. This is not a situation where failure to abide by the Court's rules should be tolerated. III.

fice, and for the past years, I have been assigned to investigate mostly child exploitation cases. 2. In early 2006, Detective Joseph Recarey with the City of Palm Beach Police Department ("PBPD") contacted me about the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein's solicitation of minors to engage in prostitution and his lewd and lascivious con

tein is aware of that classification at this time. From the physical description of the private investigator, I knew that Banasiak was referring to Paul Lavery, a private investigator who had traveled to the homes of several victims. 11. A grand jury subpoena was served on Mr. Lavery at his office in Miami.

ctims identified. fi Epstein's counsel is correct, however, in asserting that Epstein's criminal conduct first came to the attention of the FBI when the City of Palm Beach Police Department became concerned about the way the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office was handling the matter. The investigation of the Palm Beach Police De

refers to as warran ff i ce. F6 Through the FBI's investigation, it was determined that at some point before the execution of the search a l and Paul Lavery, a private investigator, traveled to Epstein's house and collected the computers, which were later turned over to William Riley, the subpoenaed part

ctims identified. F2 Epstein's counsel is correct, however, in asserting that Epstein's criminal conduct first came to the attention of the FBI when the City of Palm Beach Police Department became concerned about the manner in which the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office was handling the state prosecution. The investigation of t

y have known about the United States' attempts to locate those computers for at least two months, when a subpoena for the same items was served upon Paul Lavery, another private investigator who worked with Riley. This is not a situation where failure to abide by the Court's rules should be tolerated. III.