Epstein Secrets

Hon. Warren C. Conklin Hon. Burton S. Katz Hon. Charles C. Lee (Ret.) Hon. Elwood Lui Hon. Philip M Sae

997. Professional Licenses Admitted to the Bar: California, 1959; U.S. District Court, Central District of California, 1959; U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, 1964; U.S. Supreme Court, 1971. Professional Associations California Judges Association (Past Vice President; Executive Board, Past Member); Los A

join levii@akemuncom. [email protected] Charles H Lichiman on behalf of Defendant Herbert Stettin

tted to practice before the United States Supreme Court, First Circuit, Second Circuit, Third Circuit; Fourth Circuit, Fifth Circuit, Sixth Circuit, Ninth Circuit, and Eleventh Circuit. 3. Movant designates RONALD G. NE1W1RT14, ESQ., of FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, P.A., who is qualified to practice in this Court

join levii@akemuncom. [email protected] Charles H Lichiman on behalf of Defendant Herbert Stettin

tted to practice before the United States Supreme Court, First Circuit, Second Circuit, Third Circuit; Fourth Circuit, Fifth Circuit, Sixth Circuit, Ninth Circuit, and Eleventh Circuit. 3. Movant designates RONALD G. NE1W1RT14, ESQ., of FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, P.A., who is qualified to practice in this Court

nnel, J.D., of the National Legal Research Group, Charles J. Nagy, J.D., Thomas Muskus, J.D., Eric C. Sure

is ca- pacity as District Attorney for San Francisco County, et aL, Defendants- Appellees. Nos. 82-4427, 83-2581. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 12, 1984. Decided Sept. 3, 1986. Citizen and organizations promoting voting rights of Americans with ethnic backgrou

contractor and surety for breach of al- leged subcontract. The United States District Court for the District of Massa- chusetts, 186 F.Supp. 428, Charles Ed- ward Wyzanski, Jr., J., dismissed the complaint, and general contractor appeal- ed. The Court of Appeals, Hartigan, Circuit Judge, held that w

Robert W. Ware, United States Marshal for the Southern District of California, Appel. ken. Mime. Nos. 895, 596. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Nov. 5, 1958. Accused, who had been indicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for alleged- t mailing cir

ates District Court for the District of Montana, Charles C. Lovell, J., of receipt of child pornography a

y Op. Serv. 11,330, 2007 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,672 (Cite as: 504 F.3d 737) H U.S. Sinerius C.A.9 (Mont.),2007. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Emil SINERIUS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-30327. Argued and Submitted March 9, 20

N AND ORDER DENYING GOVERNMENTS MOTION TO DETAIN CHARLES E. BINDER, United States Magistrate Judge. The G

take of age jury instruction because it is consti- tutionally mandated. He relies on United States District Court, 858 F.2d at 537-43, in which the Ninth Circuit engrafted a mistake of agc defense in- to the statute after concluding that such a defense was required under the First Amendment although the stat

ember 2000 of Fell's mother Debra, her companion Charles Conway, and King. The facts are largely undisput

peaching statements that would have been subject to disclosure if the investigator had testified about them. **2166 The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit while acknowledging that the trial court's ruling constituted a `very lim- ited and seemingly judicious restriction,' 501 F.2d, at 151, nevertheles

& Berland, Berkeley, CA, for Defendants. ORDER CHARLES R. BREYER, J. *1 Now pending before the Court is

es. *3 While plaintiffs do not cite any case in which a court has held that the doctrine does not apply, the Court's own research reveals that the Ninth Circuit has held that the doctrine of forum non conveniens is inapplicable to Jones Act and FELA cases j because each Act contains a mandato venue provi