Epstein Secrets

pstein) 2 "Decisions by the former Fifth Circuit issued before October 1, 1981, are binding as precedent in the Eleventh Circuit." United States v. Brown, 342 F.3d 1245, 1246 n.1 (11th Cir. 2003). 12 EFTA00304753 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 127 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2011 Page 13 of 25

power of district courts to remedy CVRA violations comes from the Fifth Circuit's decision in In re Dean, 527 F.3d 391 (5th Cir. 2008). There, the Fifth Circuit found a violation of crime victims' right to confer with prosecutors regarding a plea agreement. The Circuit, however, declined to grant its own rem

recedent in the Eleventh Circuit." United States' Brown, 342 F.3d 1245, 1246 n.1 (11th Cir. 2003). 12

power of district courts to remedy CVRA violations comes from the Fifth Circuit's decision in In re Dean, 527 F.3d 391 (5th Cir. 2008). There, the Fifth Circuit found a violation of crime victims' right to confer with prosecutors regarding a plea agreement. The Circuit, however, declined to grant its own rem

ity.") (citation omitted); Liggett Group Inc., v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. , 116 F.R.D. 205, 210

. F2In Bonner v. City of Prichard , 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981) ( en banc), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as precedent all decisions of the prior Fifth Circuit court of Appeals decided prior to October 1, 1981. FIThe Supreme Court called this "a novelty in criminal procedure with which we are wholly unacqu

DC, Daniel T. Hartnett, Royal B. Martin, Martin Brown & Sullivan, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for Interested Par

rime, e m and that this holding extended to statements made by government counsel at a plea hearing); Anderson, 55 F.Supp.2d at 1167 (%In Smith, the Fifth Circuit extended the Briggs rule well beyond the grand jury context, and ordered other court filings and records naming an unindicted co-conspirator sealed

lity.") (citation omitted); Liggett Group Inc., I Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. , 116 F.R.D. 205, 210

ury. UIn Bonner1 City of Prichard , 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981) ( en banc), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as precedent all decisions of the prior Fifth Circuit court of Appeals decided prior to October 1, 1981. FIThe Supreme Court called this "a novelty in criminal procedure with which we are wholly unacqu

08-80804-CrV-MARRA/JOHNSON cite. See Mitchell'. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 294 F.3d 1309, 1314 (

hard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1207 (11th Cir. 1981) (en bane), the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circuit rendered prior to October 1, 1981. On February 20, 2008, the plaintiff was deposed in State of Florida'. Jeffrey Epstein, 502006CF009454 (Fla. 15t

g trafficking offenses may properly be required to disclose the details of their personal finances as a condition of *1222 supervised release. See Brown, 402 F.3d at 137(affirming financial disclosure condition imposed on defendant convicted of drug trafficking in part because "given this particula

order of the district court denying the motion of appellant is affirmed. CITY OF MIANI I SUTTON et al. No. 13113. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. April 25,1050. Dnrward B. Sutton and Sarah R. Sutton. cluing bald flOkIl as the Sutton Jewelry Com- pany hmnght suit against the City of Miami t

t [ ] independent of the search." United States Brown, 328 F.3d 352, 357 (7th Page 8 Cir.2003) (inter

a, 110 F.3d 260, 263 (5th Cir.1997)). ut see United Page 12 States I Laney. 189 F.3d 954 (9th Cir.1999) (pecuniary gain required). In fact, the Fifth Circuit in Canada found that the defendant's distribution of material involving the sexual exploitation of minors with a purpose of enticing another to ha

ty.") (citation omitted); Liggett Group Inc., v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 116 F.R.D. 205, 210 (

974 'In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981) (en bane), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as precedent all decisions of the prior Fifth Circuit court of Appeals decided prior to October 1, 1981. -8- EFTA00179107 F.2d 127 (9th Cir. 1992); United States v. White, 950 F.2d 426, 430 (7th Cir.

See supra p. 33. FN 10. See supra n. 2. FN I 1. Defendant's reliance on United States v. Brown, 801 F.2d 352 (8th Cir.1986), is misplaced. In Brown, the Eighth Circuit determined that the defend- ant had breached a cooperation agree- ment, thus permitting the government to prosecute him for the

otSet&mt... 6/8/2009 EFTA00182793 Page 2 of 11 Westlaw. 162 F.3d 832 162 F.3d 832 (Cite as: 162 F.3d 832) C United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond CASTANEDA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 97-40307. Dec. 9, 1998. Defendant was convicted i