Epstein Secrets

was excused from appearing before the grand jury and that Mr. Riley did not flout the subpoena by failing to appear. AUSA agreed with Attorney Mr. Black that Mr. Riley would not have to appear and produce the disputed items if a motion to quash all aspects of the subpoenas was filed. Neither party's

EIN RE: MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein, a and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor ass

RRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE cc: AUSA Roy Black, Esq. William Richey, Esq. EFTA00222959

ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES' MOTION TO SEAL This matter comes before the Court upon the United States' Motion to Seal the documents related to its Surreply regarding the pending Motion to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas. The Court being fully apprised in the premises, orders that the motion is hereby GRANTED

appearing before the grand jury and that Mr. Riley did not flout the subpoena by failing to appear. The undersigned's supervisor, , agreed with Mr. Black that Mr. Riley would not have to produce the disputed items if the motion was filed. It is understandable that this could have been interpreted as

EIN RE: MOTION TO OUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor ass

ore the grand jury and that Mr. Riley did not flout the subpoena by failing to appear. The undersigned's supervisor, Andrew Lourie, agreed with Mr. Black that Mr. Riley would not have to produce the disputed items if the motion was filed. It is understandable that this could have been interpreted as a

EIN RE: MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein, a and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor ass

ed from appearing before the grand jury and that lid not flout the subpoena by failing to appear. The undersigned's supervisor,-, agreed with Mr. Black that would not have to produce the disputed items if the motion was filed. It is understandable that this could have been interpreted as an excuse

EIN RE: MOTION TO OUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor assert that was

t that was excused from appearing before' the grand jury and that did not flout the subpoena by failing to appear. AUSA a greed with Attorney Mr. Black that would not have to appear and produce the disputed items if a motion to quash all aspects of the subpoenas was filed. Neither party's pleading

PSTEIN RE: ON TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witnessi and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: 1. Both the witness and the intervenor assert that wa

was excused from appearing before the grand jury and that Mr. Riley did not flout the subpoena by failing to appear. AUSA agreed with Attorney Mr. Black that Mr. Riley would not have to appear and produce the disputed items if a motion to quash all aspects of the subpoenas was filed. Neither party's

IN RE: MOTION TO OUASII GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: 1. Both the witness and the intervenor ass

ther stated that he was told the job needed to be done as soon as possible. Mr. Kleiman was meeting with a private investigator who worked with Mr. Black on July 26, 2007 in the morning at Mr. Kleiman's place of employment in Boca Raton. Mr. Kleiman described the investigator as an "old-time New York

ITED STATES' SURREPLY TO REPLIES FILED BY WITNESS WILLIAM RILEY AND INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN RE: MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS I. In its Surreply, the government, for the first time, after the parties have filed numerous pleadings directed to the enforceability of the challenged subpoena, anno