Epstein Secrets

acting Brian and engaging in sexual conversations after learning Brian was fifteen. After extensive breaks in their communications, it was usually Blazck who reestablished the intemet relationship. The jury instructions included the is- sues of entrapment and predisposition to commit the crime charge

to bring in association with or connection with." Morales Trans World Airlines, 504 U.S. 374, 383, 112 S. . 2031, 119 L.Ed.2d 157 (1992) (quoting Black's Law Dictionary 1128 (5th ed.1979)) (construing "relating to" in a different statutory context). We have construed "relarg to" language broadly in

, 112 S. . 2031, 119 L.Ed.2d 157 (1992) (quoting Black's Law Dictionary 1128 (5th ed.1979)) (construing

See United States Soto-Beniquez, 356 F.3d I, 52 (1st Cir.2004) ("Any possible prejudice to [defendant] from the government's non-compliance [with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32] was cured by the district court's two-week continuance to give defense counsel an ad- equate opportunity to respondlo the gove

' MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL Intervenors Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, Jay Lefkowitz, and Jeffrey Epst

led to obtain those materials in discovery in the first instance. That question must be answered by reference to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, which refers to Federal Rule of Evidence 501, which "empower[s] the federal courts to `continue the evolutionary development of [evidentiary] privileges!" Adkins v. Christie, 488 F.

______ ____________________________________ Roy Black, Esq. Counsel to Jeffrey Epstein R. ALEXANDER A

evidence. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(f) (“The admissibility or inadmissibility of a plea, a plea discussion, and any related statement is governed by Federal Rule of Evidence 410.”). In any case, the victims could have been impeached regarding the possibility of their obtaining monetary damages through either a c

with them. - Dated:_ Jeffrey Epstein Dated:_ Roy Black, Esq. Counsel to Jeffrey Epstein R. ALEXANDER ACO

as evidence. See Fed! R. Crim. P. 11(f) (“The admissibility or inadmissibility of a plea, a plea discussion, and any related statement is governed by Federal Rule of Evidence 410.”). In any case, the victims could have been impeached regarding the possibility' of their obtaining monetary damages through either a ci