Epstein Secrets

The Palm Beach Post's (the "Post") Motion to Intervene and Petition for Access to certain court records in this case. It is our understanding that Bradley Edwards and William Berger of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler have filed a similar motion on behalf of a non-party known as =11 and that a motion is set for he

• •••••••• ••••••••••••••• • To: R. Alexander Acosta, Esq. Fax: Judith Stevenson Arco, Esq. Michael McAuliffe, Esq, Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Brad ley J. Edwards, Esq. William J. Berger, Esq. From: Deanna K. Shullman, Esq. Date: 06/01/2009 Re: State v. J. Epstein Pages: 6 Urgent U For review U I Pl

el for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 80811 Brad Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las O

hael McAuliffe, Esq. Jack Alan Coldberger, Esq. Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. William J. Berger, Esq. From: »minne K. Shullm

mise not to prosecute defendant, even though defendant was acquitted on drug charges arising out of incident in question. Reversed and remanded. West Headnotes Criminal Law 110 *C=.42.5(3) 110 Criminal Law 11011 Defenses in General I 10k42 Immunity to One Furnishing Inform- ation or Evidence I 1 0k42.5

Florida, this day of , 2009. 1 e v izOOS David French !:)r- c\c"``A- Circuit Judge Copies furnished: TTON, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., EDWARDS, ESQ., Brad Edwards and Associates, , JAY HOWELL, ESQ., Jay Howell & Associates, PA, erbury Goldberger & Weiss, PA., EFTA00722688 IN THE COURT O

day of , 2009. 1 e v izOOS David French !:)r- c\c"``A- Circuit Judge Copies furnished: TTON, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., EDWARDS, ESQ., Brad Edwards and Associates, , JAY HOWELL, ESQ., Jay Howell & Associates, PA, erbury Goldberger & Weiss, PA., EFTA00722688 IN THE COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUD

is day of , 2009SAGOO et -, IREml VA r e `0 • David French' . Circuit Judge Copies furnished: TTON, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., D EDWARDS, ESQ., Brad Edwards and Associates. , JAY HOWELL, ESQ., Jay Howell & Associates, PA, iterbuly Goldberger & Weiss. P.A. EFTA00722689 g e sz LEOPO

rris, J., held that certiorari was available to quash order permitting discovery that trial court acknowledged was irrelevant Certiorari granted. West Headnotes 11) Pretrial Procedure 307A C=31 307A Pretrial Procedure 307All Depositions and Discovery 307A11(A) Discovery in General 307Ak31 k. Relevancy an

ten and adopted to guarantee Americans greater freedom than had been enjoyed by their ancestors who had been driven from Europe by per- secution." Edwards, 430 A.2d at 13 (Mack, J., dissenting) (quoting Carlson i Landon, 342 U.S. 524, 556, 72 S.Ct. 52 , 542, 96 L.Ed. 547reh. denied,343 U.S. 988, 72

remanded. McKay, Circuit Judge, dissented and filed opinion, in which Seymour, Circuit Judge, joined, also filing a separate dissenting opinion. West Headnotes Ill Bail 49 C=.44(1) 49 Bail 491I In Criminal Prosecutions 49k41 Right to Release on Bail 49k44 Pending Appeal or Other Proceeding for Review