Epstein Secrets

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201 CASE NO. Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually, Defendants. 50 2009 CA 0 b 0 3 MOUE 4) COPY RECEIVED FOR HUNG DEC u ( 2008 sriesnoN Ii poCK COMPLAINT p

nt, ROTHSTEIN and Stuart Rosenfeldt, are and were the principal owners of equity in RRA and each co-founded RRA. 6. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant hereto, EDWA

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

iction over this matter pursuant to the laws controlling Writs of Mandamus 2. This matter is properly before this court 3. The findings of Judge Marta in the court below, in the orders dated March 25 and April 23, 2009, are well based in fact and law. EFTA00729503

cedures. I don't remember saying anything different in this case. I did not see any FBI letters in this case prior to collecting the FBI letters to Brad Edwards' clients in connection with the Jane Doe I United States litigation. I did not instruct the FBI to include the language about the case being under in

y Circuit Court (Exhibit B-41). I responded, acknowledging his representation (Exhibit B-42). On June 18, 2008, I liv received a call from attorney Brad ards, who told me that he represented Individual #43, who is also Jane Doe #1 in the Jane Doe United States lawsuit. Mr. Edwards expressed an interest

a call from attorney Brad ards, who told me that he represented Individual #43, who is also Jane Doe #1 in the Jane Doe United States lawsuit. Mr. Edwards expressed an interest in assisting with the case. We were still waiting to hear about whether we would be moving " On the State side, Lefkowitz has

I decided not to follow his recommendation, and I stayed in the criminal division. Please advise if further information is needed. Sincerely, dal Marta rilliskrages. A. Marie Villafaila Page 58 of 58 EFTA00225540 BAKER,DONELSON 100 116111 STREET • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21202 • 410.685.1120. baker

e 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Epstein v. Edwards, et al Matter No. 291874 Dear Mr. Critton: 0 T

e items referred to in this letter. SCAROIA eP Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Walter A. Stein, Paralegal asES3seta. EFTA0072

A WEB-WANES A °AWAY eAmiLRAT T. PAROLE si43.• MR* SPSOTE enAH A Center EAR L. Dont( pea OROS S. FuLIABl• JANES w.OuSTAFSONL AMP SU. DAL. IC 'Marta' Atm% mel0 • DANN& LUNY*" vituns &NORTON'. MRCP S 0014/M• faAAR0011011 SSALES• 4 AWN OCLAOLA CHRIMAN It Slav *, Jaw A.SHIPLET CHRISTOPHER K.

eking more information before deciding whether to quash a plea agreement that put Palm Beach billionaire Jeffrey Epstein behind bars for 18 months. Brad Edwards, a Hollywood attorney representing three girls who claim they were sexually abused by Epstein, appeared before U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra lat

me and community service after he leaves the Palm Beach County Jail, includes an agreement that the federal government will not prosecute Epstein. Edwards said his clients were not consulted when the plea deal was negotiated. The girls, each identified publicly as a "Jane Doe," were about to be named a

troom Friday, U.S. Attorney Dexter Lee said the federal District Court has no jurisdiction over the plea agreement approved in state Circuit Court. Marta did not rule but asked for more information about the girls' involvement, if any, in the plea negotiations. Marra, according to Edwards, also expres

e items referred to in this letter. SCAROIA eP Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Walter A. Stein, Paralegal asES3seta. EFTA0061

e 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Epstein v. Edwards, et al Matter No. 291874 Dear Mr. Critton: OTA

S 011FGOAT VARRHARTR oRROCE aRS.S.• MR* BMW R CSPSO enterRS GAIL L 0130424 Pea ORD•DA S FuLMEtt • rueS w.OuSTAR2014. JACK, ' HIU. DAY. K. 'Marta* witLiAm IL MO, csarevL Lew*" vALLAMA.3400106/H MACK S CIRMAR• fORARON 1102 0WOISALES H AWN OC.AOLA 0.4333nAN D SEARCY JetNAARIPLEY•" CHRIST

offenses. The judge left open what the possible remedy could be.113-91 v. Epstein (2015) External video In a December 2014 Florida court filing by Bradley Edwards and Paul G. Cassell mean • • • the Crime Victims M Where are they, now? The Rights - Act lawsuit,114131 ,t (then known as Pi099511:OY_ets ini

n a December 2014 Florida court filing by Bradley Edwards and Paul G. Cassell mean • • • the Crime Vict

re she was using on her twitter account was not her but a picture of a young blond student of hers. Vincent had had no previous direct contact with Marta before this - Marta started sending him personal photos of her holidays, beaches by email and personal messages - when confronted he denied he had

judge left open what the possible remedy could be.D93 Virginia Giuffre v. Epstein (2015) External video In a December 2014 Florida court filing by Bradley Edwards g and Paul G. Cassell meant for inclusion in the Crime Victims Where are they now? The Rights Act lawsuit,PO1 Virginia_ Giuffre (then known as

n a December 2014 Florida court filing by Bradley Edwards g and Paul G. Cassell meant for inclusion i

ils, messages or work schedule calendar MI 0 • fL4 4 Vincent 0 4 .251W19 1 love you more than anything. I have never done anything with this Marta and I didn't drink with Kylie. Again it was a farewell and 200 people received that email. The email was sent to the School mailing list and I

in is asking a federal judge to appoint a receiver to take over Epstein's prop- erty to prevent him from hiding or transferring as- sets abroad. Bradley Edwards also has asked that the re- ceiver order Epstein to post a $15 million bond to ensure money is avail- able if the women prevail in their lawsuits

n's victims, attorney Brad Edwards asked to have the document unsealed as part of his federal lawsuit against the Manhattan money manager. Although Edwards and his victims have seen the agreement. Edwards s in his pleadings thai the iswerranent has "inaccurately described the agreement . creating a fa

ged Edwards' case. Se.'king to keep the agreement sealed. Assistant U S Attorney Dexter Lee argued that the agreement is not part of any case before Marta "The non-prosecution agreement has never been filed under seal in federal court," he wrote. lie also dented that the agreement has been inaccurate

t beneficiaries 100.00% Dana Bums Katie Vaughan-Edwards (100.00%) Summary of your contributions Contrib

t segregaed from other balm?, an tee Pommy ay on these ftrds n the ordiwy course of oestosisson These furds se payable upon nas comae The toted 6 Marta in no ment pal si dos hg value Winn information red dew« olomaton on Clef rms lending Drachma« «doom Movie yOLCCI*11 Mal berAp Armman or Accoult

EBB 2010-781 scanned and taken to Lea* fog redaction and mailino Public Records Reauest 2010781 received on 6130/10 from Farmer. Jaffe. meissing. Edwards. Fistos & Lehrman. P.L. for copy or 'tittles-Vs Ale Bond tail aedresalk Sublett reigned 07/22/2009 422109._ Qffender Called me_today, Stated it

e Idenditer• Plea note: The ragbeint has neat« additional owns accounts not displayed here. col um biadentait (2)yonootom. lepreedayenoo com scars/Marta/Tattoos Ei I do NOT have any Scan, Marks or Tattoo". 1. (Type) (Lmartion) (Oescnpton) 2. (TYPO (Loa!lon) (Desorption) Vehicles El I do NOT