Epstein Secrets

fined term "Government." See supra at 1-3. Notwithstanding this objection, the Respondent admits that, as of July 3, 2008, it had not made attorney Bradley J. Edwards aware that it had already entered into a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein or that the non- prosecution could preclude the prosecution

SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 2 v. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRAMATTHEWMAN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 (954) 524-2820

s, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRAMATTHEWMAN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 Paul G. Cassell S.J

nited States Department of Justice (such as, the Office of the Attorney General, the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the Criminal Divisions, the Office of Professional Responsibility, the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, the U.S. Attorney's Offices for the Southern District and Middle District of Florida, the Southern D

tes Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Facsimile: December 5, 2008 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Brad Edwards Esq. 2028 Street, Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020 Re: Jeffrey Epstein,. Shawna Rivera. and Notification of Work Release Dear Mr. Edwards: By

mi, FL 33160 305.931.2200 16 For Jane Doe 17 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 18 401 East Las Ola

have counsel state their appearances? MR. HOROWITZ: Adam Horowitz, counsel for plaintiffs Jane 2 through Jane Doe 7. THE COURT: Good morning. MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, counsel for plaintiff Jane Doe. THE COURT: Good morning. MR. GARCIA: Good morning, Your Honor. Sid Garcia for Jane Doe II. THE CO

or your convenience, I attach a copy of that letter.) It was my understanding that you deemed my allegations serious enough to forward my letter to the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) for further investigation, and it was my impression that 0PR was going to look into the allegations raised in my letter. I must say that I w

ntial Profes.f Criminal Law Telephone: [email protected] September 29, 2011 Re: Follow-up on Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Ferrer: As you know, Brad Edwards and I represent Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in their efforts to protect their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. You were nice enough to m

Boulevard Miami, FL 33160 16 For Jane Doe 17 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 18 401 East Las Ola

l state their appearances? 4 MR. HOROWITZ: Adam Horowitz, counsel for plaintiffs 5 Jane 2 through Jane Doe 7. 6 THE COURT: Good morning. 7 MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, counsel for plaintiff Jane 8 Doe. 9 THE COURT: Good morning. 10 MR. GARCIA: Good morning, Your Honor. Sid Garcia for 11 Jane Doe

or your convenience, I attach a copy of that letter.) It was my understanding that you deemed my allegations serious enough to forward my letter to the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) for further investigation, and it was my impression that 0PR was going to look into the allegations raised in my letter. I must say that I w

ASSELL Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law September 29, 2011 Re: Follow-up on leffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Ferrer: As you know, Brad Edwards and I represent Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in their efforts to protect their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. You were nice enough to m

frey Epstein Dear Mr. Ferrer: As you know, Brad Edwards and I represent Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in th

or your convenience, I attach a copy of that letter.) It was my understanding that you deemed my allegations serious enough to forward my letter to the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) for further investigation, and it was my impression that OPR was going to look into the allegations raised in my letter. I must say that I w

From: Paul Cassell To: AIIMMUSAFLS)" "Brad Edwards" Cc: 1=USAFIi m .ielME>, ' (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Can We Talk Sooner? And Resolve Our Factual Differences? Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:57:11 +0000

From: Paul Cassell To: AIIMMUSAFLS)" "Brad Edwards" Cc: 1=USAFIi m .ielME>, ' (USAFLS)" Subject:

ide you with the answers that you have requested in connection with the Jane Doe v. United States lawsuit. Both the referral of your allegations to the Office of Professional Responsibility and the request for our Office to "step aside" in the Jane Doe litigation are not insignificant matters. As you doubtless are aware, the position th

To: Paul Cassell <[email protected]>, Brad Edwards <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Proposed email to Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 21:57:54 +0000 Importance: Normal De

To: Paul Cassell <[email protected]>, Brad Edwards <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Proposed e

ide you with the answers that you have requested in connection with the Jane Doe I. United States lawsuit. Both the referral of your allegations to the Office of Professional Responsibility and the request for our Office to "step aside" in the Jane Doe litigation are not insignificant matters. As you doubtless are aware, the position th

From: To: "Paul Cassell' Cc: "Brad Edwards" Subject: FW: Proposed email to Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 21:57:54 +0000 Importance: Normal Dear Paul and Brad: As I

From: To: "Paul Cassell' Cc: "Brad Edwards" Subject: FW: Proposed email to Paul Cassell and

ide you with the answers that you have requested in connection with the Jane Doe I. United States lawsuit. Both the referral of your allegations to the Office of Professional Responsibility and the request for our Office to "step aside" in the Jane Doe litigation are not insignificant matters. As you doubtless are aware, the position th

tes District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer. Jaffe. Weissin Edwards. Fistos & Lehrm

t Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer. Jaffe. Weissin Edwards. Fistos &

on September 13, 2013, a declaration from a Department of Justice Official to formally invoke the deliberative process privilege for documents from the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), and a declaration from the United States Attorney, to formally invoke the deliberative process privilege for documents generated by the U.S.

0 Importance: Normal From: (USAFLS) < Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 4:55 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Proposed email to Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards This is fine. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda February 24, 2011 4:44 PM To: USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: Proposed email to Paul rasseii and Br

ect: RE: Proposed email to Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards This is fine. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda Fe

ide you with the answers that you have requested in connection with the Jane Doe v. United States lawsuit. Both the referral of your allegations to the Office of Professional Responsibility and the request for our Office to "step aside" in the Jane Doe litigation are not insignificant matters. As you doubtless are aware, the position th

Monday to discuss. Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorney Fax From: .(USAFLS)<IM ME> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 4:58 PM To: Paul Cassell; Brad Edwards Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: FW: Proposed email to Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards Dear Paul and Brad: As I promised, since returning to work

ebruary 24, 2011 4:58 PM To: Paul Cassell; Brad Edwards Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: FW: Proposed

ide you with the answers that you have requested in connection with the Jane Doe I. United States lawsuit. Both the referral of your allegations to the Office of Professional Responsibility and the request for our Office to "step aside" in the Jane Doe litigation are not insignificant matters. As you doubtless are aware, the position th