Epstein Secrets

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti

porting exhibit 30 be filed in the public file and docketed as of today's date, as timely filed. DATED: January 21, 2015. Respectfully Submitted, Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 524-28

o sleazy, unprofessional, disbarrable lawyers, Paul Cassell, a former federal judge [and] current professor, and another sleazy lawyer from Florida, Brad Edwards — . .. and said who would fit into this description: A lawyer, who knows Epstein, who helped draft ...? Ha, Dershowitz! So they and the woman got t

a phone) as the vehicle of the inducement. See, e.g., United States ' Murrel, 368 F.3d 1283, 1286 (11th Cir. 2004) (government must ... prove that Murrell, using the intemet, acted with a specific intent to persuade a means to engage in unlawful sex). In fact, we have reviewed every indictment filed i

in, 08-CV-80893-KAM: This suit was filed by one of the victims who brought the victim's rights suit against the United States. She is represented by Brad Edwards. The Complaint raises the following claims: sexual exploitation, sexual abuse and/or sexual assault of a minor (Count 1), "Cause of Action pursuant

st the United States. She is represented by Brad Edwards. The Complaint raises the following claims: sexua

facility (the mail, phone, or intemet)—not thereafter—and the scienter element must be present while the facility is being used. See United States'. Murrell, 368 F.3d 1283, 1286 (11th Cir. 2004) ("[T]he government must first prove that [Defendant], using the Internet, acted with a specific intent to per

also, Ander- son United States, 8 Cir., 1966, 369 F.2d 1, 19, cert. denied, 1967, 386 U.S. 976, 87 S.Ct. 1171, 18 L.Ed.2d 136; ago, this court. Edwards United States. 8 Cir., 1966, 361 F.2d 32, 734. The District Court in this case found that these elements were lacking: *e art in complete ac- cor

nder § 2422(b) requires a finding only of an intent to entice, not an intent to perform the sexual act following the persuasion); United States v. Murrell. 368 F.3d 1283, 1286 (11th Cir2004) (stat- ing that the underlying conduct that 2422(b) criminalizes is the persuasion of the minor, rather than t

d sexual conversations, tried to entice the victim by representa- tions about his car, house, and money, and went to a prearranged meeting place); Murrell, 368 F.3d at 1288 (holding that the evidence was sufficient where the defen- dant traveled two hours to meet a minor for sex in exchange for money,

as long as such a reading is not plainly contrary to the i intent of Congress. United States X-Citement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64, 78 (1994), citing Edward., DeBartolo_ Corp. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Constr. Thades Council, 485 U.S. 568 (1988). At the least, to eliminate questions as to its const

.3di261 (11*Cir. 1 ); United States Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (I Id' Cir. 005); United States Root, 296 F.3d 1222 (11* Cir. 200 ). United States' Murrell, 368 F.3d 1283 (11* Cir. 2004), is in the same mold, except that, in that sting operation, the defendant communicated, not with the purported 13 yea

s long as such a reading is not plainly contrary to the intent of Congress. United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64, 78 (1994), citing Edward., DeBartolo_ Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Constr. Thades Council, 485 U.S. 568 (1988). At the least, to eliminate questions as to its con

a phone) as the vehicle of the inducement. See, e.g., United States v. Murrel, 368 F.3d 1283, 1286 (11ih Cir. 2004) (government must ... prove that Murrell, using the intemet, acted with a specific intent to persuade a means to engage in unlawful sex). In fact, we have reviewed every indictment filed i

, as I ng as such a reading is not plainly contrary to the intent of Congress United States X-Citement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64, 78 (1994), citing Edward." DeBartolo Corp. Florida GulfCoast Building & Constr. Trades Council, 485 U.S. 568 (1988). At e least, to eliminate questions as to its constitut

r"o4-eit • „ , • _ w02, 01.4,1 \I! , , is ;fig 1/4 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-011951 EFTA00226739 Definitions of Inducument I) U.S. I Murrell, 3681. 3d 1283, 1287 (II" Cir. 2004). In a charge of violation §2422(b), the term "induce means to stimulate the occurrence of "or to" cause the min