Epstein Secrets

500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 EFTA00213424 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax EFTA00213425 t ow EFTA00213426 09/21/2007 02:54 PM To 'Jay Lefitowitz" cc bcc Subject RE: Reminder Hi Jay — I thought there was 5 years' probation with 18 months in jail followed by 12 months' home confinement. I o

ing all attachments. ****************************************************** * * * * * EFTA00213414 . . EFTA00213415 09121/2007 02:12 PM To "Jay Lofkowitz" cc bcc Subject Revised Non-Prosecution Agreement message heat3Cen • -Ow; Hi Jay — Here is my attempt at combining our thoughts. I need to tal

l, at Mr. Epstein's expense (and I get to pick the attorney), that is alright with me. — Original Message .I.JSAFLEN)" eat: 9 3 007 1.21 3 1/ To: Jay Leflcowitz Subject: Revised agreement Hi Jay - Can you look at this? Especially paragraph 7. I think this covers the exclusive remedy concern you had. «0709

al Messa e --- From: at: 7 11:1 AMA T To: Jay Lefkowitz Subject: RE: Draft Agreements? .1 11— I don't k

lrkland•Ellls' on '11/26/2007 01:11:55'. >» EFTA00213368 UNITED STATES vs, JEFFREY EPS I PAN PLEA PROFFER On August 21, 2007, FBI Special Agents E. Nesbitt and traveled to the home of Lesley Groff to serve her with a federal grand jury subpoena in connection with an investigation pending in the Southe

olding adjudication or sentencing, and probation or community control in lieu of imprisonment." I have more than a dozen e-mails between myself and Jay Lefkowitz discussing the U.S. Attorney's insistence on eighteen months of incarceration. You will recall that at one meeting you and Ms. Sanchez raised the id

. Atkinson, R. Senior, J. Sloman, D. Lee, and A.M. Villafafia regarding scope of Epstein agreement and correspondence and telephone conference with J. Lefkowitz (NB: Emails to and from J. Lefkowitz and R. Black have been produced to Petitioners' counsel) Work Product Deliberative Process Attorney-Client

/25/2008 emails between A.M. Villafafia, A. Acosta, J. Sloman, R. Senior, K. Atkinson, and D. Lee regarding letter received from J. Lefkowitz (NB: Lefkowitz letter has been produced to Petitioners' counsel) Work Product Deliberative Process Attorney-Client Privilege P415187 thru P-015194 8/20/2008-

3 thru P-015186 8/25/2008 emails between A.M. Villafafia, A. Acosta, J. Sloman, R. Senior, K. Atkinson, and D. Lee regarding letter received from J. Lefkowitz (NB: Lefkowitz letter has been produced to Petitioners' counsel) Work Product Deliberative Process Attorney-Client Privilege P415187 thru P-01

Client Privilege Investigative Privilege 6(e) Privacy Act/TVPA/CVRA P-014929 thru P-014933 5/27/2008-5/28/2008 emails between A.M. Villafafia, E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall, and J. Richards regarding request for legal analysis of statute of limitations issues under state and federal law Attorney-Client Pri

acy to commit an assault on a plane. I just want to make sure that we have something that is factually accurate. Just trying to plan ahead" (id). At Jay Lefkowitz's request, MAUSA Lourie and I scheduled a conference call with him for early on the morning of September 14, 2007 (id. at 25). Mr. Lourie did not att

Villafana letter to Lclkowitz, Black, and Goldberger regarding history of Epstein's performance under the NPA 89 6/17(2009 Villafaila letter to Lelkowitz regarding monitoring future performance under the NPA 90 9/1/2009 Black letter to Montan seeking approval for Epstein to transfer community contr

draft Plea Agreement 9/18/2007 1:37pm draft Information 9/18/2007 Garcia, Villafaiia Lourie Email stating new terms that Louric negotiated with Lefkowitz 9/19/2007 A. Laurie, R. Garcia, K. A. Marie Villafana Email re negotiating strategy with attached correspondence l6 9/19/2007 A. A. Marie Vi

tings. B-103 1/10/20”, Email chain between Myesha Braden and Marie Villafaila regarding meeting on 1/11/2008 B-104 1/14/2008 Marie Villafatia, E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall, Jason Richards Myesha Braden Email chain regarding meeting and additional 302s B-105 1/17/2008 Agents compile evidence for Bob Sen

ice" in § 3771(a)(5) is 3 Jane Doe No. 2's exculpatory statements regarding Epstein were not lost on his attorneys. A December 21, 2007 letter from Jay Lefkowitz, one of Epstein's attorneys, to U.S. Attorney Acosta, devoted two pages examining Jane Doe No. 2's interview testimony on April 24, 2007. Ex. D at

by Epstein's attorneys to the Deputy Attorney General. Ex... On June 23, 2008, John Roth, Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General wrote to Messrs. Lefkowitz and Stair, advising them that "federal prosecution of this case is appropriate." Ex. I. Mr. Roth also told Epstein's attorneys that their allegation

1 in order to obtain information from Jane Doe No. 2. Ex. B; Ex. S,11 6-12. On April 24, 2007, Jane Doe No. 2 was interviewed by FBI Special Agents E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and Jason Richards and AUSA Marie in the presence of her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq. Ex. C; Ex. R, 5; Ex. S, ¶ 12. Jane Doe No. 2

I (a)(5) is significant 3 Jane Doe No. 2's exculpatory statements regarding Epstein were not lost on his attorneys. A December 21, 2007 letter from Jay Leflcowitz, one of Epstein's attorneys, to U.S. Attorney Acosta, devoted two pages examining Jane Doe No. 2's interview testimony on April 24, 2007. Ex. D at

hts associated with the agreement entered into by the United States and Mr. Epstein in a timely fashion." Ex. N, Nov. 27, 2007 email from Sloman to Lefkowitz. Epstein's attorneys responded by citing to the Attorney General's Guidelines provision stating that there must be a charge filed in a Federal distr

01 in order to obtain information from Jane Doe No. 2. Ex. B; Ex. S, 6-12. On April 24, 2007, Jane Doe No. 2 was interviewed by FBI Special Agents E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and Jason Richards and AUSA Marie Villafafia, in the presence of her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq. Ex. C; Ex. R, I 5; Ex. S, q 12. Ja

71(a)(5) is significant 3 Jane Doe No. 2's exculpatory statements regarding Epstein were not lost on his attorneys. A December 21, 2007 letter from Jay Lefkowitz, one of Epstein's attorneys, to U.S. Attorney Acosta, devoted two pages examining Jane Doe No. 2's interview testimony on April 24, 2007. Ex. D at

hts associated with the agreement entered into by the United States and Mr. Epstein in a timely fashion." Ex. N, Nov. 27, 2007 email from Sloman to Lefkowitz. Epstein's attorneys responded by citing to the Attorney General's Guidelines provision stating that there must be a charge filed in a Federal distr

1 in order to obtain information from Jane Doe No. 2. Ex. B; Ex. S,11[6-12. On April 24, 2007, Jane Doe No. 2 was interviewed by FBI Special Agents E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and Jason Richards and AUSA Marie Villafafia, in the presence of her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq. Ex. C; Ex. R, 15; Ex. S, ¶ 12. Jan