Epstein Secrets

construed as an admission of civil or criminal liability in regards to any of those who seek compensation from the Trust. See draft proposal from Jay Lelkowitz to Andrew l.nurie dated September 15. 2007. In response, Ms. • nded that the Agreement contain language considering the inclusion of guardian ad M

ch. I did this in an attempt to avoid what I foresaw would likely be 'litigious seleaion process. It was only after I proposed this change that Mr. Lelkowitz raised with me his enumerated concerns. 2 Section 2255 provides that: "[tiny person who, while' minor, was' victim of violation of [enumerated secti

dentified victims and Epstein's counsel may contort the identified victims through that counsel. Sere draft non-pmsecutio agreement nailed from to Lelkowitz dated September 17. 20117. The inclusion of I guardian ad litem. however. only served to complicate mailers. We continued to reiterate our objectio

fendant is gljugggI in the case in which' victim seeks to assert her statutory rights.") (emphasis added) Since there has been no offense charged in Federal district court in this matter, the identified individuals necessarily do not qualify as "crime victims". In addition, the Attorney General Guidelines furthe

ice" in § 3771(a)(5) is 3 Jane Doe No. 2's exculpatory statements regarding Epstein were not lost on his attorneys. A December 21, 2007 letter from Jay Lefkowitz, one of Epstein's attorneys, to U.S. Attorney Acosta, devoted two pages examining Jane Doe No. 2's interview testimony on April 24, 2007. Ex. D at

by Epstein's attorneys to the Deputy Attorney General. Ex... On June 23, 2008, John Roth, Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General wrote to Messrs. Lefkowitz and Stair, advising them that "federal prosecution of this case is appropriate." Ex. I. Mr. Roth also told Epstein's attorneys that their allegation

armed as a result of the commission of a Federal 20 EFTA00211737 offense or an offense in the District of Columbia, "if the offense is charged in Federal district court." Thus, if there was no offense charged in Federal district court, then a person could not be a crime victim for purposes of enforcing the ri

I (a)(5) is significant 3 Jane Doe No. 2's exculpatory statements regarding Epstein were not lost on his attorneys. A December 21, 2007 letter from Jay Leflcowitz, one of Epstein's attorneys, to U.S. Attorney Acosta, devoted two pages examining Jane Doe No. 2's interview testimony on April 24, 2007. Ex. D at

hts associated with the agreement entered into by the United States and Mr. Epstein in a timely fashion." Ex. N, Nov. 27, 2007 email from Sloman to Lefkowitz. Epstein's attorneys responded by citing to the Attorney General's Guidelines provision stating that there must be a charge filed in a Federal distr

y and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia, "if the offense is charged in Federal district court." Thus, if there was no offense charged in Federal district court, then a person could not be a crime victim for purposes of enforcing the ri

71(a)(5) is significant 3 Jane Doe No. 2's exculpatory statements regarding Epstein were not lost on his attorneys. A December 21, 2007 letter from Jay Lefkowitz, one of Epstein's attorneys, to U.S. Attorney Acosta, devoted two pages examining Jane Doe No. 2's interview testimony on April 24, 2007. Ex. D at

hts associated with the agreement entered into by the United States and Mr. Epstein in a timely fashion." Ex. N, Nov. 27, 2007 email from Sloman to Lefkowitz. Epstein's attorneys responded by citing to the Attorney General's Guidelines provision stating that there must be a charge filed in a Federal distr

y and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia, "if the offense is charged in Federal district court." Thus, if there was no offense charged in Federal district court, then a person could not be a crime victim for purposes of enforcing the ri

addressed by your Office. Sincerely, 1 P Ja . Lefkowitz cc: Jeffrey H. Sloman, First Assistant U.S. Att

fendant is charged in the case in which a victim seeks to assert her statutory rights.") (emphasis added) Since there has been no offense charged in Federal district court in this matter, the identified individuals necessarily do not qualify as "crime victims". In addition, the Attorney General Guidelines furthe

rd to your response to the concerns we have raised that have not yet been addressed. wish you a very happy and a healthy new year. Sincerely. v . Lefkojitz cc : Honorable Alice Fisher. Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey II. Sloman. First Assistant U.S. Attorney RFP MIA 000047 EFTA00184930 Case 9:0

fendant is charged in the case in which a victim seeks to assert her statutory rights.") (emphasis added) Since there has been no offense charged in Federal district court in this matter, the identified individuals necessarily do not qualify as "crime victims". In addition, the Attorney General Guidelines furthe