Epstein Secrets

it utterly fails to demonStrate 1 t t • Government theory supports what at its essence is a federalization of underage prostitution {see letter to Lelkowitz of December 13. 2007 al lig 4, per I). This is compellingly sx) kir several reasons: • Absent testimony, the evidence does not exclude the possibi

stal Service. Thank you. EFTA01718527 • U.S. Departinent of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: Miami, FL 33132-2111 Facsimile: December 6, 2007 I wr

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET DATE: December 6, 2007 TO: Jay Leflcowitz, Esquire FAX NUMBER: SUBJECT: Epstein NUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUDING THIS PAGE: 9 @001. EFTA01718526 U.S. Department of Justice United States At

y precludes the initiation or continuation of a federal prosecution, following a prior state or federal prosecution based on substantially the same act(s) or transaction(s) unless three substantive prerequisites are satisfied: first, the matter must involve a substantial federal interest; second, th

tion of Resolution of Epstein Investigation; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alexander Acosta dated October 10

e counsel: the Agreement and the addendum thereto; the USAO's letter of Crime Victims' Rights —Notification of Resolution of Epstein Investigation; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alexander Acosta dated October 10, 2007; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alexander Acosta dated October 23, 2007; R. Alexander Acosta's l

y precludes the initiation or continuation of a federal prosecution, following a prior state or federal prosecution based on substantially the same act(s) or transaction(s) unless three substantive prerequisites are satisfied: first, the matter must involve a substantial federal interest; second, th

tion of Resolution of Epstein Investigation; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alexander Acosta dated October 10

e counsel: the Agreement and the addendum thereto; the USAO's letter of Crime Victims' Rights —Notification of Resolution of Epstein Investigation; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alexander Acosta dated October 10, 2007; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alcor Acosta dated October 23, 2007; R. Alexander Acosta's lett

y precludes the initiation or continuation of a federal prosecution, following a prior state or federal prosecution based on substantially the same act(s) or transaction(s) unless three substantive prerequisites are satisfied: first, the matter must involve a substantial federal interest; second, th

zgaiirkiend.coi cc Subject RE: Meeting A. Marie Villcialla Assistant U.S. Attorney — Ori From: \(USAFLS\)" Sent: 09/19/2007 11:51 AM AST To: Jay Leflcowitz Subject: Meeting Barry is available Monday morning. Our most flexible West Palm Beach magistrate is on duty on Monday, so, assuming we have signe

ey Epstein - con I ential (USAFLS) Dear Mr. Jay Lefkowitz [[email protected]] (USAFLS) I write to

iscretion by appropriate officers of the Department of Justice in determining whether to bring a federal prosecution based on substantially the same act(s) or transactions involved in a prior state or federal proceeding." The purpose of the policy "is to vindicate substantial federal interests through

Granting Motion for Limited Appearance of Jay P. Lefkowitz) (Critton, Robert) (Entered: 05/21/2009) 05/21/

tify that Plaintiff was paid by others for similar sexual acts she claims Mr. Epstein forced upon her or that she willingly participated in certain act(s) that would negate or lessen her damages. This goes directly to Plaintiff's damage claim. 7. Likewise, subpoenas must be issued to third-party tre

September 17, 2007 email from M. Villafana to J. Lefkowitz attaching draft Deferred Prosecution Agreement, E

to protect persons charged with criminal conduct from the burdens associated with multiple prosecutions and punishments for substantially the same act(s) or transaction(s)." Id. To that end, Petite "establishes guidelines for the exercise of discretion by appropriate officers of the Department of Jus