Epstein Secrets

For Production, Use, And Disclosure Of Plea Negotiations, 161 MOTION for Protective Order Supplemental Briefing Of Intervenors Black, Weinberg, And Lefkowitz In Support Of Their Motion For A Protective Order Concerning Production, Use, And Disclosure Of Plea Negotiations by Roy Black, Jeffrey Epstein, Jay Lef

Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf 201 S Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami , FL 33131 USA 305-371-6421 Fax: 305-358-2006 Email:[email protected] Jay P. Lefkowitz PRO HAC VICE;ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Kirkland & Ellis. LLP Email:[email protected] Martin G Weinberg PRO HAC VICE;ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Ma

tered: 09/26/2011) 09/27/2011 100 RESPONSE/REPLY to 94 Supplement Briefing in Support of Motion to Intervene of Black, EFTA00211447 Weinberg. and Lefkowitz by United States of America. 09/27/2011) 09/28/2011 101 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 100 Response/Reply (Other), 94 S

Colchico, Consor and Associates, 561-682-0905 (ir) (Entered: 08/12/2011) 08/19/2011 90 NOTICE by United States of America o artment of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel Opinion (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)( (Entered: 08/19/2011) 08/22/2011 91 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Supplemental Briefing b

e ...............................60 3. September 7, 2007: Acosta, Other USAO Attorneys, and FBI Supervisors Meet with Epstein Attorneys Starr, Lefkowitz, and Sanchez ...............................................................................................62 VI. SEPTEMBER 2007: THE PLEA NEGO

t, in the interest of full disclosure, I did not believe that Mr. Epstein would be eligible because he will not be in Zone A or B.117 This morning Jay Lefkowitz called and said that I was correct but, if we could get Mr. Epstein down to 14 months, then he thought he would be eligible. My response: have hi

TMENT’S INTERPRETATION OF THE CVRA’S DEFINITION OF “CRIME VICTIM” AT THE TIME OF THE EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION ................ 192 A. April 1, 2005 Office of Legal Counsel “Preliminary Review” ............................192 B. 2005 Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance ..............193 IV.

- year term. The subjects did not have a clear memory of why this reduction was made. Villafaña attributed it to a conversation between Acosta and Lefkowitz, but Acosta attributed it to a decision made during the negotiating process by Villafaña and Lourie, telling OPR that he understood his attorneys n

ice. III. THE DEPARTMENT’S INTERPRETATION OF THE CVRA’S DEFINITION OF “CRIME VICTIM” AT THE TIME OF THE EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION A. April 1, 2005 Office of Legal Counsel “Preliminary Review” In 2005, Department management requested informal guidance from the Department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) regarding int