Epstein Secrets

re for the hearing. See A.77 (Letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz to Hon. Ruth Pickholz, dated Sept. 9, 2010). In

omptly retained New York counsel and sought a brief adjournment to provide counsel an opportunity to prepare for the hearing. See A.77 (Letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz to Hon. Ruth Pickholz, dated Sept. 9, 2010). In October 2010, Appellant's counsel submitted a detailed memorandum to the Assistant District Attorn

8 reporting to police that "most of the girls lied" to Appellant about their ages). • J.L. Dep. 15:25-17:2 (woman testifying that she was told by H.R. that she had to be over 18 to massage Appellant, so she lied and claimed to be 19 because she wanted to make money). • F.P. Tr. 5:5-8 (woman telli

en took proactive steps to ensure that Appellant did not know that they were underage when he hired them to provide massages: • H.R. Tr. 12:13-21 (H.R. telling police that she lied to Appellant and told him that she was 18 when she was only 17, and further 14 Notably, the age of consent under Flor

it utterly fails to demonStrate 1 t t • Government theory supports what at its essence is a federalization of underage prostitution {see letter to Lelkowitz of December 13. 2007 al lig 4, per I). This is compellingly sx) kir several reasons: • Absent testimony, the evidence does not exclude the possibi

stal Service. Thank you. EFTA01718527 • U.S. Departinent of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: Miami, FL 33132-2111 Facsimile: December 6, 2007 I wr

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET DATE: December 6, 2007 TO: Jay Leflcowitz, Esquire FAX NUMBER: SUBJECT: Epstein NUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUDING THIS PAGE: 9 @001. EFTA01718526 U.S. Department of Justice United States At

1 RIRRLAND&ELLIS LLP Q014 Man Dcrshowitz, Esq. December 7, 2007 Page 7 See United Sates v. Searcy 418 F.3d 1193, 1197 (11'h Cir. 2005) (citing H.R. Rep. No. 104.458, at 193 (1996) (Conf.Rep.)). See also K. Seto, Note; How Should Lepislation Deal with Children and the Victims and Perpetrators o

tion of Resolution of Epstein Investigation; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alexander Acosta dated October 10

e counsel: the Agreement and the addendum thereto; the USAO's letter of Crime Victims' Rights —Notification of Resolution of Epstein Investigation; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alexander Acosta dated October 10, 2007; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alexander Acosta dated October 23, 2007; R. Alexander Acosta's l

KIRKLAND&ELLIS LLP ra014 Alan Dershowitz, Esq. December 7, 2007 Page 7 See United Sates v. Searcy 418 F.3d 1193, 1197 (11th Cir. 2005) (citing H.R. Rep. No. 104.458, at 193 (1996) (Conf. Rep.)). ace ast K. Seto, Note- How S_hould Legislation Deal with Children and the Victims aid terpetrators o

ice" in § 3771(a)(5) is 3 Jane Doe No. 2's exculpatory statements regarding Epstein were not lost on his attorneys. A December 21, 2007 letter from Jay Lefkowitz, one of Epstein's attorneys, to U.S. Attorney Acosta, devoted two pages examining Jane Doe No. 2's interview testimony on April 24, 2007. Ex. D at

by Epstein's attorneys to the Deputy Attorney General. Ex... On June 23, 2008, John Roth, Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General wrote to Messrs. Lefkowitz and Stair, advising them that "federal prosecution of this case is appropriate." Ex. I. Mr. Roth also told Epstein's attorneys that their allegation

tutory scheme is designed to confer rights upon crime victims in the federal judicial system, not in the various state judicial systems. See, e.g., H.R. Rep. 108-711, at 10, 2004 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2274, 2283 ("This section amends Title 18 to codify eight statutory rights of crime victims in the Federal ju

ffrey Epstein, Faces Increased Calls To Resign," reports that the Miami Herald has revealed that Acosta "made a deal with Washington, D.C. attorney Jay Lefkowitz, his former colleague, at a breakfast meeting in October 2007," which "closed an FBI probe into whether there were more victims, granted immunity to

"made a deal with Washington, D.C. attorney Jay Lefkowitz, his former colleague, at a breakfast meeting in

ity Act of 201% 'S. 1857, Federal Energy and Water Management Performance Act of 2019','5. 1064, Appalachian Energy for National Security Act', and 'H.R. 1138, to reauthorize the West Valley demonstration project, and for other purposes', with testimony from Assistant Secretary of Energy for Electric

I (a)(5) is significant 3 Jane Doe No. 2's exculpatory statements regarding Epstein were not lost on his attorneys. A December 21, 2007 letter from Jay Leflcowitz, one of Epstein's attorneys, to U.S. Attorney Acosta, devoted two pages examining Jane Doe No. 2's interview testimony on April 24, 2007. Ex. D at

hts associated with the agreement entered into by the United States and Mr. Epstein in a timely fashion." Ex. N, Nov. 27, 2007 email from Sloman to Lefkowitz. Epstein's attorneys responded by citing to the Attorney General's Guidelines provision stating that there must be a charge filed in a Federal distr

tutory scheme is designed to confer rights upon crime victims in the federal judicial system, not in the various state judicial systems. See. e.g., H.R. Rep. 108-711, at 10, 2004 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2274, 2283 ("This section amends Title 18 to codify eight statutory rights of crime victims in the Federal ju

tion of Resolution of Epstein Investigation; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alexander Acosta dated October 10

e counsel: the Agreement and the addendum thereto; the USAO's letter of Crime Victims' Rights —Notification of Resolution of Epstein Investigation; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alexander Acosta dated October 10, 2007; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alcor Acosta dated October 23, 2007; R. Alexander Acosta's lett

KIRKLAND&ELLIS LLP [ib014 Alan Dershowitz, Esq. December 7, 2007 Page 7 See United Sates 1. Searcy 418 F.3d 1193, 1197 (11th Cir. 2005) (citing H.R. Rep. No. 104.458, at 193 (1996) (Conf.Rep.)). ace ast K. Seto, Note- How S_hould Legislation Dcal with Children and the Victims aid terpetrators of

f Justice Washington, D.C. 20530 June 23, 2008 Jay Lefkowitz„ Esq. Kenneth Starr, Esq. Kirkland and Ellis LL

stice Washington, D.C. 20530 June 23, 2008 Jay Lefkowitz„ Esq. Kenneth Starr, Esq. Kirkland and Ellis LL

nses. This section expands the number of sex offenses in which a minor may pursue a civil remedy for personal injuries resulting from the offense." H.R. Rep. 105-557, at 23 (1998), as reprinted in 1998 U.S.C.C.A.N. 678, 692. And perhaps most telling, Congress amended § 2255 in 2006— three years after

71(a)(5) is significant 3 Jane Doe No. 2's exculpatory statements regarding Epstein were not lost on his attorneys. A December 21, 2007 letter from Jay Lefkowitz, one of Epstein's attorneys, to U.S. Attorney Acosta, devoted two pages examining Jane Doe No. 2's interview testimony on April 24, 2007. Ex. D at

hts associated with the agreement entered into by the United States and Mr. Epstein in a timely fashion." Ex. N, Nov. 27, 2007 email from Sloman to Lefkowitz. Epstein's attorneys responded by citing to the Attorney General's Guidelines provision stating that there must be a charge filed in a Federal distr

tutory scheme is designed to confer rights upon crime victims in the federal judicial system, not in the various state judicial systems. See. e.g., H.R. Rep. 108-711, at 10, 2004 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2274, 2283 ("This section amends Title 18 to codify eight statutory rights of crime victims in the Federal ju

September 17, 2007 email from M. Villafana to J. Lefkowitz attaching draft Deferred Prosecution Agreement, E

dant JEFFREY EPSTEIN employed L.G. to perform, among other things, services as a personal assistant. 1) Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and paid T.M., H.R., and A.F. to perform, among other things, recruiting services. 4. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN owned a property located at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm B