Epstein Secrets

Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz [DE 78] at 6. Second, also in opposing the intervention of attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowtiz, the plaintiffs argued that "[o]nly Epstein has an interest in the validity of the non-prosecution agreement . . . ." Jane Doe I and Jane Doe 2's R

ment of inconvenience does not go far because many of the issues raised by Mr. Epstein parallel the issues raised by attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Letkowitz as well as those raised during the August 12, 2011 hearing, and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 do not have to file their responsive pleadings addressing

ment 93 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2011 Page 3 of 9 First, they argued in their opposition to the intervention of attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz that Mr. Epstein "is the real party in interest" and that "harm from the release of the materials (if any) could be only to Jeffrey Epstein." Jane D

materials (if any) could be only to Jeffrey Epstein." Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Response To Motion To Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz [DE 78] at 6. Second, also in opposing the intervention of attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowtiz, the plaintiffs argued that "[o]nly Epstein has

("GTG"), which hired a consulting firm, Hunter R Contracting LLC ("Hunter R") and TSSA Storm Safe Inc. ("TSSA"), to perform insurance estimates. Kenneth Remain was a member of Hunter R. After several years of this consulting relation- ship, GTG terminated Hunter R and TSSA, which led to litigation

n led to; the impeachment ofPresident Clinton. Marra describes an October 2007 breakfast meeting between Acosta, who,is now U.S; labor secretary, and Lefkowitz shortly after the noh-prosecution agreement was inked, After the meeting, Lefkowitz sent Acosta a note thanking him for “the commitment you made to m

ruling. Neither Black nor New York City attorney Jay Lefkowitz,,who led efforts to bury the federal indictment,

illionaire on dozens of federal charges in connection with the girls’ claims that he paid them for sex at his Palm Beach mansion,, U.S. Districtjudge Kenneth Marra ruled on.Thursday. In a blistering 33-page ruling, Marra meticulously and methodically detailed the numerous steps federal prosecutors took to

to intervene on Epstein's behalf. The U.S. Attorney's Office said it wouldn't comment on Marra' s ruling. Neither Black nor New York City attorney Jay Lefkowitz, who led efforts to bury the federal indictment, responded to emails or phone calls for comment. West Palm Beach attorney Jack Goldberger, who rep

ed to the impeachment of President Clinton. Marra describes an October 2007 breakfast meeting between Acosta, who is now U.S. labor secretary, and Lefkowitz shortly after the non-prosecution agreement was inked. After the meeting, Lefkowitz sent Acosta a note thanking him for "the commitment you made t

lionaire on dozens of federal charges in connection with the girls' claims that he paid them for sex at his Palm Beach mansion, U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra ruled on Thursday. In a blistering 33-page ruling, Marra meticulously and methodically detailed the numerous steps federal prosecutors took t

ing to intervene on Epstein’s behalf. The U.S. Attorney’s Office said it wouldn’t comment on Marra's ruling. Neither Black nor New York City attorney Jay Lefkowitz, who led efforts to bury the federal indictment, responded to emails or phone calls for comment. West Palm Beach attorneyJack Goldberger, who represe

led to the impeachment of President Clinton. Marra describes an October .2007 breakfast, meeting between Acosta, who is now U.S. labor secretary, and Lefkowitz shortly after the non-prosecution agreement was. inked, After the meeting, Lefkowitz sent Acosta a note thanking him for "the commitment you made to

.Acosta, his line prosecutor~and Ep~tein' s t~a111 of lawyers .. His phalan;x: of lawyers indud~.d note~ Hal'Vard.law professor Ala:nDershowitz and:Kenneth I Starr, the former U.S. solicitor ienetal whose investigation led to the impeachment of Presfdent Clinton. Marra descripes an OcJob~r 2007'.bre:

atutes that have been identified by prosecurors-18 U.S.C. e 1591. 2422(b), and 2423(h). Onu of the other members of Mr. Epstein's defense team, lay Letkowitz, has personally reviewed the reporter's contemporaneoua notes. Although some of the women alleged to be involved were 16 and 17 years of age, sever

EFTA00175950 00/02/08 19/..1.1 :,81, FAX 22A. pip, 8440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE DOJ/ODAG la 002 )003/0la 05.177,2002 12 19 I- A:: kg, line • UV.) Kenneth \.V. Siarr Kirkland St. tattle 1.1.1' •vrevi .Alt. F.1%• I i (;SC LM:IfriLkift: in:, Maill27, 2008 u1,\ FACSIMILE (1(I2 514.0367 I honorabl

2918 Robert Deweese Critton, Jr [COR LD NTC] Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL, USA 33401-2918 Lefkowitz, Jay P [COR LD NTC] Kirkland & Ellis 655 15TH Street NW Suite 1200 Washin•ton DC USA 20005 Shumsky, Michael D [COR LD NTC] Kirkland & Ellis Con

PLAINTIFF: L, C DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:10cv80447 FILING DATE: 3/31/2010 JURISDICTION: Federal Question JUDGE: Marra, Kenneth A REFERRED TO: Magistrate Judge Johnson, Linnea R NATURE OF SUIT: 320 Assault, Libel & Slander FILING TYPE: Civil CAUSE: Fed. Question: Personal

5:6,22 549:9 550:4 522:10 537:10 569:25 577:3 Lefkowitz (1) 646:18 552:9,12,14,16 578:21 584:12 585:22

44:16 545: II 463:18 464:4,5 mmw.phi sr orting.com EFTA00615783 16 MI Ken (2) 495:14 621:4 Kendall (2) 548:12 585:22 Kennedy (1) 514:21 Kenneth (2) 463:15 495:8 kept (1) 627:9 Kimberly (5) 514:10 516:12 518:13 520:2 521:14,21,25 522:3 525:21 528:14,21,21 531:12 532:19 533:5,10,13