Epstein Secrets

As set forth in caption. There has been no change in the parties. 3. NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT OR PETITIONER: Jay P. Lefkowitz, Sandra Lynn Musumeci KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, Neiril4611 Telephone: Facsimile: 4. NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUM

W PENDING IN ANY COURT OF THIS OR ANY OTHER JURISDICTION. 10. THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL APPEAL PENDING IN THIS ACTION. Dated: February 9, 2011 Ja . Lefkowitz, P.C. S dra Lynn Musumeci KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, Ne i -4611 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorneys for Defendant-Appella

Alan Dershowitz, former Judge and then Pepperdine Law Dean Kenneth Starr, former Deputy Assistant to the President and then Kirkland & Ellis Partner Jay Lefkowitz, and several others, including prosecutors who had formally worked in the U.S. EFTA00232721 Attorney's Office and in the Child Exploitation and Ob

7 least 35:10 mandate 7:24 8:20 39:8 41:5 42:23 39:3 41:4,6,11,18 19:7,10212523:1 leave 33:17,19 821 10:3 43:444:1 42:1,2,3 24:5 2525 26:7,11 Lebowitz 2:20 4:18 many 20:23 31:3 motions 10:14 17:15 number 15:9 16:21 26:12,16 27:13 4:18 35:17 42:1 21:5 30:5 35:21 17:7,9,14,21,24 31:6 32:17 33

R BEYER,LAWRENCE COHLAN,JOHN LEFKOWITZ,ELISE JAMES,JANET B HILL,MELANIE

BENDAT,STEVE HENDERSON,GUY L LESOWITZ,SIDNEY LINDSAY,ALAN COONEY,CATHY

as against the hbs of Messrs. Ef.ack, Derabowitz, Lefkowitz and Shirr. It was a proud tuomc . I also intend

. pri (friend: !MOTION for Extension of Time to Filo Respoeseassly as to 56 MOTION to intervene of Rey Medi. o' 67 04/1.4/7011 In welted. end lay Lebowitz lane Doe El and laicDoe in Unomosed Hots Not Emorolm of 221Efi nem to Coordinate Fay Intl to Meted tD Intents by /tine Co.. (ktiOnnerkti: Text of

h. I did dos in an attempt to avoid what I foresaw would likely be a litigious selection peoceSs. It was only after I ptoposcd this change that Mr. Lefkowitz raised with nie his enumerated conceals. 2 Seethe' 22M provides that: "rainy person who. while a minor, was a victim of a violation of le:numerated

h. I did rhos in an anempt to avoid what I foresaw would likely be a litigious selection process. It was only after I proposed this change that Mr. Lebowitz. raised with me his enumerated concerns. 2 Section 2251 provides that "fa thy person who. white a minor, was a victim oi a violation of le -rated s