Epstein Secrets

On June 19, 2008, I sent an email to State Attorney Krischer advising him that we had spoken with Roy Black about wrapping up both the state and federal /times (Exhibit 68). I reminded State Attorney Krischer that the signed NPA required a plea to the curr

ire Epstein to elect either the 12/19/07 letter or not, but to make it clear in writing (Exhibits B-73 through B-82). On August 15, 2008, I wrote to Roy Black and Jay Lefkowitz confirming their position that the final agreement consisted only of the NPA and Addendum (Exhibit B-83). By discarding USA Acosta

at your convenience. Very truly yours, BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, PC /s/ Jonathan Biran JB/smr Enclosures/Attachment cc: AUSA A. Marie Villafafia 4822.5464-0166x1 2865555-000127 05/10/2019 EFTA00225547 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 So

placing the names of those victims on the list prepared by our office, that term could have been negotiated. In fact, at one of our early meetings, Roy Black raised that concern, and possible solutions were contemplated by our office prior to the negotiations. However, since none of Mr. Epstein's team of

der Acosta United States Ajtomey By: Jeffrey . Sloman First Assistant United States Attorney Enclosure cc: R. Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attorney AUSA A. Marie Villafafia 'This is contingent, however, on being able to provide adequate notice of the change of plea and sentencing. The sooner that you schedule that hear

placing the names of those victims on the list prepared by our office, that term could have been negotiated. In fact, at one of our early meetings, Roy Black raised that concern, and possible solutions were contemplated by our office prior to the negotiations. However, since none of Mr. Epstein's team of

er Acosta United States Attorney By: Jeffrey Sloman EFTA00189928 First Assistant United States Attorney cc: It Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attorney AUSA A. Marie Villafafia Based upon the language of this statute, your statement that our notification must be limited only to the right to restitution is incorrect. nYou