Epstein Secrets

VESTIGATION TIMELINE Date To From Re: Exhibit # 5/18/2007 Matthew Menchel A. Marie Villafana Email informing Menchel of intent to subpoena Roy Black's private investigator and steps taken to obtain DOJ authorization 26 5/21/2007 Matthew Menchel and Jeff Sloman A. Marie Villafafia Email seeki

/8/2008 Villafafia Sloman Email response to Villafafials 10/8/08 email advising to send a copy of pleading to Roy and Jay 10/8/2008 Villafafia, Roy Black, cc: Atkinson, Lee Lefkowitz Email thanking Villafafia for fowarding United States' Response to Petitioners' Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution

and jury subpoena to victim/witness, revisions to indictment, planned grand jury presentation, and plans to supersede indictment B 13; 6/23/2008 DAG Filip completes review of Epstein's appeal 6/23/2008 6/23/2008-6/26/2008 Emits between Marie Villafana and grand jury witness regarding immunity and tra

and had been told that Epstein would not be eligible for work release. Accordingly, I provided my Notice of Breach, but was told by defense attorney Roy Black that, despite those specific conversations, USA Acosta himself agreed that Epstein would be eligible for any program 3 "Unwinding" was USA Acosta's

ire Epstein to elect either the 12/19/07 letter or not, but to make it clear in writing (Exhibits B-73 through B-82). On August 15, 2008, I wrote to Roy Black and Jay Lefkowitz confirming their position that the final agreement consisted only of the NPA and Addendum (Exhibit B-83). By discarding USA Acosta

if he wishes." (Exhibit B-19.) Although I did not know it at the time, in preparing this response, I noticed that, in FAUSA June 3, 2008 letter to DAG Filip, he stated that the quoted language was proposed by USA Acosta "in consultation with DAAG ." (Exhibit B-123 at 7.) On December 21, 2007, attorney

ation of possible compelled disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agreement B-74 8/6/2008 Email response from Bob Senior to Marie Villafaila regarding Roy Black's response to email B-75 8/12/2008 Email response from Bob Senior to Marie Villafana to request for conference call prior to call with Roy Black

8/2008 Villafaiia Slornan Email response to Villafafia's 10/8/08 email advising to send a copy of pleading to Roy and Jay 10/8/2008 Villafaiia, Roy Black, cc: Atkinson, Lee Lefkowitz Email thanking Villafaiia for fowarding United States' Response to Petitioners' Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution

nd jury subpoena to victim/witness, revisions to indictment, planned grand jury presentation, and plans to supersede indictment IS Ill 6/23/2008 DAG Filip completes review of Epstein's appeal 6/23/2008 6/23/2008-6/26/2008 Emails between Marie Villafaiia and grand jury witne, regarding immunity and tra

On June 19, 2008, I sent an email to State Attorney Krischer advising him that we had spoken with Roy Black about wrapping up both the state and federal /times (Exhibit 68). I reminded State Attorney Krischer that the signed NPA required a plea to the curr

ire Epstein to elect either the 12/19/07 letter or not, but to make it clear in writing (Exhibits B-73 through B-82). On August 15, 2008, I wrote to Roy Black and Jay Lefkowitz confirming their position that the final agreement consisted only of the NPA and Addendum (Exhibit B-83). By discarding USA Acosta

shes." (Exhibit B-19.) Although I did not know it at the time, in preparing this response, I noticed that, in FAUSA Sloman's June 3, 2008 letter to DAG Filip, he stated that the quoted language was proposed by USA Acosta "in consultation with DAAG Mandelker." (Exhibit B-123 at 7.) On December 21, 2007, a