Epstein Secrets

dwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Attorneys for Jane Doe # I and Jane Doe # 2 Roy Black Jackie Perczek Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. Attorneys for Intervenors 25 Government Exhibit A Case No. 08-Ki736-CIV-MARRA EFTA00210

sed upon the statute of limitations, which was granted by the district court. As to the dismissal of Northern Counties, the appellate court rejected Northern Counties' argument that the amendment related back under Rule 15(c). The District of Columbia Circuit relied in part upon a Fifth Circuit case, Williams'. Un

Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, 4.74 Ninrih A tin* c AN / Paul G. Cassell Quinney College of Law at the Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 Roy Black Jackie Perczek Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. Imo Attorneys for Intervenors 22 EFTA00210618

sed upon the statute of limitations, which was granted by the district court. As to the dismissal of Northern Counties, the appellate court rejected Northern Counties' argument that the amendment related back under Rule 15(c). The District of Columbia Circuit relied in part upon a Fifth Circuit case, Williams I. U

er, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell 20 EFTA00210639 C! tin" 1- • Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 Roy Black Jackie Perczek E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Intervenors 21 EFTA00210640

tially the same facts and theories as those in the earlier one." M. 1305-06. As to the dismissal of Northern Counties, the appellate court rejected Northern Counties' argument that the amendment related back under Rule 15(c). The District of Columbia Circuit relied in part upon a Fifth Circuit case, Williams I. U