Epstein Secrets

udge Marra also had scheduled a hearing on Epstein's motion to quash grand jury subpoenas for the computer equipment removed from Epstein's home by Roy Black's investigator when they learned of the state investigation. This was postponed to allow plea negotiations and eventually was withdrawn pursuant to th

IDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT EFTA00189787 and the United States. Accordingly, I recommend that we provide Epstein's counsel with Notice of the Breach at the hearing on June 12th, and proceed to indictment promptly thereafter. BACKGROUND In the summer of 2006, the FBI approached the U.S. Attorney'

ida Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 Facsimile: June 15,2009 DELIVERY BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citi rou Center Roy Black, Esq. Black Srebnick Korns an & Stumpf P.A. Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbu , Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Messrs. Lefkowi

tunc to an "Order of Community Control I," which directly contradicted the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. This required a fourth Notice of Breach and another claim that there was no "intended breach" followed by a meaningless "cure." During my conversation with Mr. Lefkowitz of June 12th rega

udge Marra also had scheduled a hearing on Epstein's motion to quash grand jury subpoenas for the computer equipment removed from Epstein's home by Roy Black's investigator when they learned of the stale investigation. This was postponed to allow plea negotiations and eventually was withdrawn pursuant to th

o. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-01 1790 EFTA00192836 and the United States. Accordingly, I recommend that we provide Epstein's counsel with Notice of the Breach at the hearing on June 12th, and proceed to indictment promptly thereafter. BACKGROUND In the summer of 2006, the FBI approached the U.S. Attorney'