Epstein Secrets

witness P-013972 5/18/2007 email from to informing him Work Product 6(e) Deliberative Process Investigative Privilege of intent to subpoena Roy Black's private investigator and steps taken to obtain DOJ authorization P-013973 thru P-013976 5/18/2007 emails between and expert witness regarding

evance Florida Bar Privacy Rules P-015239 thru P-015263 11/26/2008 emails between and Work Product Deliberative Process regarding email from R Black about work release (NB: Email from R. Black has been roduced to Petitioners' cou e P-015264 thru P-015267 12/4/2008 emails between E. and Atto

6. The correspondence further discussed a possible plea disposition that would make it hard for a judge to see what was happening: Andy [i.e., AUSA Andrew Laurie] recommended that some of the timing issues be addressed only in the state agreement, so that it isn't obvious to the judge that we are trying to c

s related to his computers and returning of his propertypo 135. On August 7, 2008, the line prosecutor emailed one of Epstein's defense attorneys, Roy Black, notice of the motion to disclose the NPA to the victims and assured him that the Government intended "to oppose the motion based upon the confident

6. The correspondence further discussed a possible plea disposition that would make it hard for a judge to see what was happening: Andy [i.e., AUSA Andrew Laurie] recommended that some of the timing issues be addressed only in the state agreement, so that it isn't obvious to the judge that we are trying to c

items from her demand list as evidence of Mr. Epstein's "non-cooperation". 'Ibis was only the beginning. Ms. Villafana also subpoenaed an agent of Roy Black (without Ibliowing the guidelines provided in the United States Attorney's Manual that require prior notification to Washington necessary to seek a

tter have no relation to the allegations against Mr. Epstein. Notably, after we objected to these overly broad and intrusive requests. Deputy Chief Andrew Laurie denied knowledge of Ms. Villalima's actions and Mr. Laurie commendably sought to significantly narrow the list of documents requested. In a subsequ

move these items from her demand list as evidence of r. .pstein's -non-cooperation". 'Ibis was only the beginning. Ms. also subpoenaed an agent of Roy Black (without following the guidelines provided in tc nited States Attorney's Manual that require prior notification to Washington necessary to seek a I

ter have no relation to the allegations against Mr. ISpstein. Notably. affix we objected to these overt broad and intrusive requests. Deputy Chief Andrew Laurie denied knowledge of Ms. s actions and Mr Laurie commendably so t igni tiara ly narrow the list of documen requested. In a subsequent court filin

s related to his computers and returning of his propertypo 135. On August 7, 2008, the line prosecutor emailed one of Epstein's defense attorneys, Roy Black, notice of the motion to disclose the NPA to the victims and assured him that the Government intended "to oppose the motion based upon the confident

6. The correspondence further discussed a possible plea disposition that would make it hard for a judge to see what was happening: Andy [i.e., AUSA Andrew Laurie] recommended that some of the timing issues be addressed only in the state agreement, so that it isn't obvious to the judge that we are trying to c

r in response of Gerald Lefcourt and I would like to speak to you further regar ing same since we do not believe that Marie's letter es raised by Roy Black. I am in my office at Original documents will not Follow by mail. Time of Transmittal: a.m./p.m. Transmitted By: Photocopy:them& be token of thi

nsion already requested by Ms. Sanche2 prior to Mr. Richey's appearance as counsel for Mr. Riley. Sincerely, Assistant United States Anorncy cc; Andrew Laurie, Esq. William Richey, Esq. Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-011927 EFTA00226715 LAW O1•1Of • Of GISliALD 13. Incotrirr,