Epstein Secrets

Weiss, Lana Belolovek, and others involved in the Epstein investigation) and defense attorneys representing Epstein (including, but not limited to, Roy Black, Jay Lefkowitz, Jack Goldberger, Martin Weinberg, Gerald Lefcourt, Michael Tien, Guy Lewis, Lilly Ann Sanchez, Ken Starr, Alan Dershowitz) and agent

w Albert Christian Edward (a/k/a Prince Andrew, Duke of York), Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, Ken Starr, Lillian Sanchez, Jay Lefkowitz, and Roy Black on his behalf. EFTA00208636 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 30 of 64 9. On January 10, 2008, Jane D

ness address. However, I did not have any direct way of contradicting sworn statement. Since then, however, in answering the victims' Requests for Admissions, the Government has admitted that it possesses information that learned confidential, non-public information about the Epstein case and that he di

and state prosecutors and others involved in the Epstein investigation) and defense attorneys representing Epstein (including, but not limited to, Roy Black, Jay Lefkowitz, Jack Goldberger, Martin Weinberg, Gerald Lefcourt, Michael Tien, Guy Lewis, Lilly Ann Sanchez, Ken Starr, Alan Dershowitz) and agent

w Albert Christian Edward (a/k/a Prince Andrew, Duke of York), Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, Ken Starr, Lillian Sanchez, Elt tefkowitz, and Roy Black on his behalf. EFTA00615897 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 265-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2014 Page 30 of 64 9. On January 10, 2008, Jane D

iness address. However, I did not have any direct ■ of contradicting sworn statement. Since then, however, in answering the victims' Requests for Admissions, the Government has admitted that it possesses information that learned confidential, non-public information about the Epstein case and that he di

Weiss, Lana Belolovek, and others involved in the Epstein investigation) and defense attorneys representing Epstein (including, but not limited to, Roy Black, Jay Lefkowitz, Jack Goldberger, Martin Weinberg, Gerald Lefcourt, Michael Tien, Guy Lewis, Lilly Ann Sanchez, Ken Starr, Alan Dershowitz) and agent

ew Albert Christian Edward (aAda Prince Andrew, Duke of York), Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, Ken Starr, Lillian Sanchez, Jay Lefkowitz, and Roy Black on his behalf. EFTA00081144 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 30 of 64 9. On January 10, 2008, Jane D

ss. However, I did not have any direct way of contradicting Reinhart's sworn statement. Since then, however, in answering the victims' Requests for Admissions, the Government has admitted that it possesses information that Reinhart learned confidential, non-public information about the Epstein case and th

etitioners can use documents and information that they received via discovery from other lawsuits in this litigation, as well as briefing related to Roy Black, et al.'s motion asserting a work product privilege. Much of the relevant material cannot be made available until the Court has ruled on those moti

ys following the Court's denial of the Motion to Stay, the United States must serve any responses and/or objections to the Petitioners' Requests for Admissions and First Request for Production. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the United States respectfully requests that the Court: (1) grant the Uni

etitioners can use documents and information that they received via discovery from other lawsuits in this litigation, as well as briefing related to Roy Black, et al.'s motion asserting a work product privilege. Much of the material that falls within the scope of the Court's order, which allowed only limit

r, alternatively, the denial of the Motion to Stay), i he United States must serve any responses and/or objections to the Petitioners' Requests for Admissions and First Request for Production. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the United States respectfully requests that the Court: (1) grant the Unit

titioners can use documents and information that they received via discovery from other lawsuits in this litigation, as well as briefing related to Roy Black, et al.'s motion asserting a work product privilege. Much of the material that falls within the scope of the Court's order, which allowed only limit

by this Rule. 5 EFTA00601812 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 140 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/24/2012 Page 6 of 7 to the Petitioners' Requests for Admissions and First Request for Production within 30 days following the entry of such order. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the United States respect

titioners can use documents and information that they received via discovery from other lawsuits in this litigation, as well as briefing related to Roy Black, et al.'s motion asserting a work product privilege. Much of the material that falls within the scope of the Court's order, which allowed only limit

by this Rule. 5 EFTA00660799 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 140 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/24/2012 Page 6 of 7 to the Petitioners' Requests for Admissions and First Request for Production within 30 days following the entry of such order. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the United States respect

questions or comments you may have and am available to discuss this and any other issues at your earliest convenience. cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Roy Black, Esq. Very truly yours, Goudf? Gerald B. Lefcourt a t41^- 1 A— l t Alan Dershowitz MIA_CEOS_00099 EFTA00191466

ted that it possessed information contradicting Reinhart's sworn affidavit. See DE 225.1 at 9-10, ¶¶ 43-45 ("in answering the victims' Requests for Admissions, the Government has admitted that it possess information that Reinhart leamed confidential non-public information about the Epstein case and he disc

nd, that is, the cost of legal services that you claim to be damages in this case. A. Okay. MR. PIKE: Form. And move to strike. THE WITNESS: Mr. Roy Black. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Okay. Who else? A. Mr. Marty Weinberger. Mr. Alan Dershowitz. Mr. Jay Lefkowitz. The firm of Burman Critton Luttier. That's

egations in that Federal M. Complaint regarding oral sex with Epstein, though he blamed it on inadvertence. See Edwards's Responses to Requests for Admissions, attached hereto as "Exhibit C." This is also evidence upon which Epstein relied not only in the filing of his case against EFTA00582835 Edwards,

riding Need; Attorney Conduct at Issue Suppl. Box 3 P-013859 Through P413860 Email, Gerald Lefcourt to Marie Villafana, Lilly Ann Sanchez, Roy Black, re: Jeffrey Epstein [Not considered privileged. Will be produced to opposing counsel upon lifting of stay) N/A Suppl. Box 3 P-013861 Thru

ss. However, I did not have any direct way of contradicting Reinhart's sworn statement. Since then, however, in answering the victims' Requests for Admissions, the Government has admitted that it possesses information that Reinhart learned confidential, non-public information about the Epstein case and th