Epstein Secrets

remove these items from her demand list as evidence of Mr. Epstein's "non-conperation-. 'Ibis was only the beginning. also subpoenaed an agent of Roy Black (without following the guidelines provided in the United States Attorney's Manual that require prior notification to Washington necessary to seek a

n's attorneys stating that "I intend to notify the victims by letter after COB Thursday [two days later]." See Tab 34, November 27, 2007 Email from J. Sloman to J. Lelkowitz. 42. The morning of November 28, attorneys for Mr. Epstein faxed a letter to Assistant Attorney General Alice Fisher, requesting a

Re: Meeting on Friday atty work-product Suppl. Box 3 P-013859 Through P-013860 Email, Gerald Lefcourt to Marie Villafana, Lilly Ann Sanchez, Roy Black, re: Jeffrey Epstein [Not considered privileged. Will be produced to opposing counsel upon lifting of stay] Suppl. Box 3 P-013861 Thru P-013

ts of victims who are not parties to this litigation Suppl. Box #3 P-013282 Thru P-013283 7/9/08 Email from A. Marie Villafafia to A. Acosta, J. Sloman, K. Atkinson, and FBI re proposed response to Goldberger letter re victim notification Attorney-Client Privilege Work product Deliberative Proce

and for various improper reasons to hold Mr. Epstein in breach of the NPA. In one instance, Ms. Villafana telephoned Ms. Epstein's defense attorney, Roy Black, to advise that Mr. Epstein's disparagement of the women in the press was a violation of the NPA, though there is absolutely no proscription in the

sel, confirming that "I understand that the plea and sentence will occur on or before the January 4th [2008] date." See October 31, 2007 Email from J. Sloman to J. Lefkowitz (emphasis added). On November 5, 2007, despite Mr. Sloman's having sent the October 31 email only a week earlier, after learning th

ion Privilege(s) Asserted Box #4 P-013970 thru P- 1 5/18/2007 email from Marie Villafafia to Matt Menchel informing him of intent to subpoena Roy Black's private investigator and steps taken to obtain DOJ authorization Work Product 6(e) Deliberative Process Investigative Privilege 2 5/21/2007 em

ts of victims who are not parties to this litigation Suppl. Box #3 P-013282 Thru P-013283 7/9/08 Email from A. Marie Villafafia to A. Acosta, J. Sloman, K. Atkinson, and FBI re proposed response to Goldberger letter re victim notification Attorney-Client Privilege Work product Deliberative Proce

ck A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400 250 Australian Ave S. West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5015 Roy Black, Esq. Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf P.A. 201 S. Biscayne Blvd, Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Messrs. Goldberger and Bl

the Government's previously made representation that it is not vouching for the veracity of any claim by any identified individual. See Letter from J. Sloman to E. (10/25/07). Second, please note also that we do not understand your request that Mr. Epstein and his attorneys execute the rider / acknowled

ent representation that “/T]he SDFL indicated a willingness to defer to the State the length of incarceration...” See Tab 1, May 19, 2008 Letter from J. Sloman, p. 2. This statement is simply not true. Contrary to Mr. Sloman’s assertion, federal prosecutors refused to accept what the State believed to be app

s in Disregard of the United States Attorney’s Manual are Used In June 2007, AUSA Villafana subpoenaed the investigating agent of Epstein’s attomey, Roy Black, in a clear effort to invade the defense camp. The subpoena was specifically drafted to discover the investigator’s contacts, with all prospective wi