Epstein Secrets

ERVICE 91 WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished via o U.S. Mail; K Facsimile; 0 Overnight Delivery to R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney's Office-Southern District, 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, Judith Stevenson Areo, Esq., Stat

K Facsimile; 0 Overnight Delivery to R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney's Office-Southern Distri

0825 requirements for a stay rests with the party requesting the stay. A trial court is not obligated, or even encouraged, to enter such a stay as the Appellate Rules specifically provide, "In the absence of a stay, during the pendency of a review of a non-final order, the lower tribunal may proceed with all matt

Y that a true and correct copy of the foiegoing has been flunishad '. :II I. . , • I. .., ! ' .,. : ' " 17 t 'via fet‘mileabe U.S. Mail to:. R. Alexander Acosta; United StatcrAttoracY'i Office _Southern qh . . . .. •••• : i Thstn • . .. ; . • . :. .., '.' 1• : . ci, 500 S. Australian Ave., Ste. 400, c

17 t 'via fet‘mileabe U.S. Mail to:. R. Alexander Acosta; United StatcrAttoracY'i Office _Southern qh . .

1325 requirements for a stay rests with the party requesting the stay. A trial court is not obligated, or even encouraged, to enter such a stay as the Appellate Rules specifically provide, "In the absence of a stay, during the pendency of a review of a non•final order, the lower tribunal may proceed with all matt

OF SERVICE WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished via o U.S. Mail; K Facsimile; a Overnight Delivery to R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney's Office-Southern District, 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, Judith Stevenson Areo, Esq., Stat

i Nials4IntileTaixt U.S. Mail to; R. Ainstneter Acosta; United StatesAtIhnt&s Oiglet ;•Soulhorn • !I l

2445 requirements for a stay rests with the party requesting the stay. A trial court is not obligated, or even encouraged, to enter such a stay as the Appellate Rules specifically provide, "In the absence of a stay, during the pendency of a review of a non-final order, the lower tribunal may proceed with all matt