Epstein Secrets

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 was supposedly sent to plaintiff, the US attorney at the time, Mr. Acosta, also sent a letter saying that he believed it was preferable to have engaged in that kind of plea bargaining with Mr. Epstein because they had a r

that he was a victim instead. That's not the situation here. So this has all the components to warrant admission under 803(8). And one more point. Alex Acosta never said he didn't have enough evidence to convict Epstein. He said it was a risk to go to trial. Every trial is a risk, and a decision not to g

22 23 24 25 problem. Well, no, it isn't. No, it isn't. Okay. So let's do 675. MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I will say that it is my reading of Rule 412 that any hearing that is based upon in part Rule 412 is supposed to be conducted in a in camera setting. MS. SCHULTZ: Counsel for Ms. has no objec

as a victim instead. 4 That's not the situation here. So this has all the components 5 to warrant admission under 803(8). 6 And one more point. Alex Acosta never said he didn't 7 have enough evidence to convict Epstein. He said it was a risk 8 to go to trial. Every trial is a risk, and a decision not

ission under 803(8). 6 And one more point. Alex Acosta never said he didn't 7 have enough evidence to

same 2 problem. Well, no, it isn't. No, it isn't. 3 Okay. So let's do 675. 4 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I will say that it is my 5 reading of Rule 412 that any hearing that is based upon in part 6 Rule 412 is supposed to be conducted in a in camera setting. 7 MS. SCHULTZ: Counsel for Ms. has no

ALOW 400 14. Ashley DrivesSuite I 100aTampa. FL 33602 813-984-3060 (Phone)•813-984-3010 (Fax) Toll Free: 866-395-7100 facsimile transmittal To: R. Alexander Acosta, Eiq. Judith Stevenson Arco, Esq. Michael McAuliffe, Esq. Jack Alan Coldberger, Esq. Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. William J. Berger, Esq. From: »mi

95-7100 facsimile transmittal To: R. Alexander Acosta, Eiq. Judith Stevenson Arco, Esq. Michael McAuli

l conduct or predisposition in civil cases, which will be continued to be governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. In order not to undermine the rationale of Rule 412, however, courts should enter appropriate orders pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 (c) to protect the victim against unwarranted inquiries and to ensu