Epstein Secrets

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 was supposedly sent to plaintiff, the US attorney at the time, Mr. Acosta, also sent a letter saying that he believed it was preferable to have engaged in that kind of plea bargaining with Mr. Epstein because they had a r

that he was a victim instead. That's not the situation here. So this has all the components to warrant admission under 803(8). And one more point. Alex Acosta never said he didn't have enough evidence to convict Epstein. He said it was a risk to go to trial. Every trial is a risk, and a decision not to g

NCES BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff BY: SIGRID S. McCAWLEY, ESQ. MEREDITH L. SCHULTZ, ESQ. S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW AT THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH For Plaintiff BY: PAUL G. CASSELL, ESQ. FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS, LEHRMAN, P.L. Attorneys for Plaintiff BY: BRADLEY J. EDWARDS,

torneys with the specific representation that these girls were "victims" of Epstein's crimes. For example, your predecessor — United States Attorney Alexander R. Acosta — communicated repeatedly to Epstein's lawyers that the girls were victims of Epstein's crimes. As you also know, U.S. Attorney Acosta's decision t

lexander R. Acosta — communicated repeatedly to Epstein's lawyers that the girls were victims of Epstein's crimes. As you also know, U.S. Attorney Acosta's decision to treat these girls as "victims" of federal crimes committed by Epstein was the subject of extensive review within the Justice Departme

U 7,4 THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH December 2, Am PAUL G. CASSELL S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW Wilfredo A. Ferrer U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida U.S. Attorney

those individuals are not the ones who at the time reviewed the evidence available for trial and assessed the likelihood of success. Respectfully, R. Alexander Acosta Former U.S. Attorney Sothern District of Florida EFTA00231603 U S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW , THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH Wifredo A. Ferrer Unite

kelihood of success. Respectfully, R. Alexander Acosta Former U.S. Attorney Sothern District of Florid

of success. Respectfully, R. Alexander Acosta Former U.S. Attorney Sothern District of Florida EFTA00231603 U S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW , THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH Wifredo A. Ferrer United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 99 N.E.4th Street Miami, FL 33132 PAUL G. CASSELL Ronald N. Boyce Presiden

those individuals are not the ones who at the time reviewed the evidence available for trial and assessed the likelihood of success. Respectfully, R. Alexander Acosta Former U.S. Attorney Sothern District of Florida EFTA00232723 U n, S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH Wifredo A. Ferrer Uni

kelihood of success. Respectfully, R. Alexander Acosta Former U.S. Attorney Sothern District of Florid

f success. Respectfully, R. Alexander Acosta Former U.S. Attorney Sothern District of Florida EFTA00232723 U n, S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH Wifredo A. Ferrer United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 99 N.E.4th Street Miami, FL 33132 G. CASSELL Ronald N. Boyce Presidential

EPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00794445 (212) 805-0300 EFTA00794446 41 H3ulgiva 1 was supposedly sent to plaintiff, the US attorney at the time, 2 Mr. Acosta, also sent a letter saying that he believed it was 3 preferable to have engaged in that kind of plea bargaining with 4 Mr. Epstein because they h

SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff BY: SIGRID S. McCAWLEY, ESQ. 16 MEREDITH L. SCHULTZ, ESQ. 17 S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW AT THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH For Plaintiff 18 BY: PAUL G. CASSELL, ESQ. 19 FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS, LEHRMAN, P.L. Attorneys for Plaintiff 20 BY: BRADLEY