Epstein Secrets

o appear and provide testimony and evidence in accordance with the issued subpoenas at the next meeting of the Grand Jury. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant United States Attorne West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: Facsimile: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY

rand Jury. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant United

, instead, the contents were voluntarily created by the persons who used them. F15 See, e.g., United States v. Doe , 465 U.S. 605, 612 (1984); In re Grand Jury Proceedings , 393 F.3d 905, 909 (9th Cir. 2004); In re Foster , 188 F.3d 1259, 1269 (10th Cir. 1999). This reasoning applies even when the documents or informa

te Attorney's Office, and order that this Motion, the Court's Order, and all further proceedings in this matter be sealed. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY BY: 111.11.1 ATESATTORNEY Florida Bar No. 0018255 500 South Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 TEL FA

be sealed. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY BY: 111.11.1 ATESATTORNE

informs the Court that the transcripts of the State's grand jury proceedings relate to the substance of a federal grand jury investigation. See In m Grand Jury Proceedings , 832 F.2d 554 (11th Cir. 1987). 7. Further in accordance with the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States informs the Court that i

be sealed. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EFTA00221131 BY: ASSI

te Attorney's Office, and order that this Motion, the Court's Order, and all further proceedings in this matter be sealed. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EFTA00221131 BY: ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Florida Bar No. 0018255 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 TEL FAA CERTIFI

informs the Court that the transcripts of the State's grand jury proceedings relate to the substance of a federal grand jury investigation. See In m Grand Jury Proceedings , 832 F.2d 554 (11th Cir. 1987). 6. Further in accordance with the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States informs the Court that i

ting of the Grand Jury. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA EFTA00222989 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: 500

rand Jury. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA EFTA00222989 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: 500

, the contents were voluntarily created by the persons who used them. EFTA00222988 See, e.g., United States' Doe , 465 U.S. 605, 612 (1984); In re Grand Jury Proceedings , 393 F.3d 905, 909 (9th Cir. 2004); In re Foster , 188 F.3d 1259, 1269 (10th Cir. 1999). This reasoning applies even when the documents or informa

o appear and provide testimony and evidence in accordance with the issued subpoenas at the next meeting of the Grand Jury. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant United States Attorney Florida Bar No. 0018255 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 CERTIFICATE OF SERVI

rand Jury. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant United St

ed, instead, the contents were voluntarily created by the persons who used them. F15 See, e.g., United States' Doe , 465 U.S. 605, 612 (1984); In re Grand Jury Proceedings , 393 F.3d 905, 909 (9th Cir. 2004); In re Foster , 188 F.3d 1259, 1269 (10th Cir. 1999). This reasoning applies even when the documents or informa

Ile...LeneA nein Black srcbmck. Kornsparl & Stumpf EFTA00179082 U.S. Department Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY VIA FACSIMILE Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Fowler White Burnett 1395 Brickell Ave Fl 14 Miami Florida 33131-3300 Re: Jeffre

ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. AUGUST 3, 2007 PAGE 2 Please let us know your client's decision by no later than August 17. I have conferred with U.S. Attorney Acosta who has asked me to communicate that the two-year term of incarceration is a non-negotiable minimum to vindicate a federal interest, and, at this ti

lled, instead, the contents were voluntarily created by the persons who used them.15 See, e.g., United States v. Doe, 465 U.S. 605, 612 (1984); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 393 F.3d 905, 909 (9th Cir. 2004); In re Foster, 188 F.3d 1259, 1269 (10th Cir. 1999). This reasoning applies even when the documents or informati