Epstein Secrets

re wrongly decided. In her Complaint, Jane Doe #101 asserted that Epstein had been convicted of state law crimes and, taking language directly from Alex Acosta's letter to Lilly Ann Sanchez, wrote that Epstein "is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed agai

d and explained to him. Epstein hereby states that be understands the conditions of this Non- Prosecution Agreement and agrees to comply with them. R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Dated: By: Dated: 77P/4" Dated: Dated: A. MARIE VTLLAFARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY OERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL T

V-MARRA P-01379 EFTA00192925 Dispoto, Mark (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Carlton, Stephen (USAFLS) Wednesday, May 8, 2019 4:53 PM Acosta, Diana (USAFLS); Bella, Gabrielle (USAFLS); Cannon, Aileen (USAFLS); Coxless, Kelly (USAFLS); Funk Daniel (USAFLS); Gyires, Marton (USAFLS); Hem, M

already would account for a would-be plaintiff's minority status. Given the rule "against reading a text in a way that makes part of it redundant," Nat'l Ass'n of Home BuildersI, Defenders of Wildlife 551 U.S. 644 (2007) (citing TRW Inc. Andrews 534 U.S. 19, 31 (2001)), and the canon that "where word

-1._,L-41-4 Of...) Of \i‘i sw“..- 'MAN>. .>1.44.14 iit-vf uftcr, Tun, ia•Tt .,,A.00RI eht•fail E tp≤ . 14 6 R. 1% 11 II 1 1 tietP1.OL-mccoa Aosta , P. ra0ort TS, eitAaft,-SOrataair. WO •Jarcvecit Atale,LC: 4 o q It N ribeiTica car- -V6-6 11,'1 16- ,M QM motea- if I) ‘0 % I .O Tal?)

ate i all i i C 3 ; .I "- - CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_02742913 EFTA_00229562 EFTA01325098 .3 s fineV:Ifirerld f r • Da Lp kR( Moon Mee and Nat'l sine laf llan 1.1a* Point* of Departure a Arrival Mies Rown RV N3 Rents. wdroceaures. Ilasseavara, Eadarsaments Number of UterfaS Aircraf

ally J.A. 10960-10972 (the district court's factual findings regarding the existence of a racially hostile work environment); Desert Palace, Inc. v. Costa, 539 U.S. 90, 101-02, 123 S. Ct. 2148, 156 L. Ed. 2d 84 (2003) (allowing the use of circumstantial evidence to show that race was a motivating fact

with citations to the authorities and parts of the record on which the appellant [**58] relies." Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(8)(A); see also Mayfield v. Nat'l Ass'n for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc., 674 F.3d 369, 376-77 (4th Cir. 2012). "Failure of a party in its opening brief to challenge an alternate grou