Epstein Secrets

aware of any "special circumstances" that warrant staying all of the civil cases pending the "expiration" of the NPA. Respectfully submitted, IL ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/A. Marie Vilkfaiia A. MARIE VILLAFAI4A Assistant United States Attorney S00 East Broward Boulevard, 7th Floor Ft

f the NPA. Respectfully submitted, IL ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/A. Marie Vilkfai

ent for fear of self incrimination in a parallel criminal proceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.'" Id. (quoting Shell Oil Co. v. Altina Assocs., Inc., 866 F. Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. FL 1994)). As this Court has previously explained: The law regarding stays of civil actions i

not aware of any "special circumstances" that warrant staying all of the civil cases pending the "expiration" of the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant United States Attorney 500 East Browar ou evard, 7th Floor Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394 Telephone: 954-356-72

f the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant United St

lent for fear of self incrimination in a parallel criminal proceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.' Id. (quoting Shell Oil Co. v. Altina Assocs., Inc. , 866 F. Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. Fl. 1994)). As this Court has previously explained: The law regarding stays of civil actions

f the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: _ I I I -16- EF

not aware of any "special circumstances" that warrant staying all of the civil cases pending the "expiration" of the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: _ I I I -16- EFTA00222220 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 121 Entered on FLSD Docket 05)29:2009 Page 17 of 17

and not "merely the loss of the defendant's most `effective defense.' Securities & Exchange Comm.'. Incendy, 936 F. Supp. at 955 (S.D. Fl. 1996); Shell Oil Co., 866 F. Supp. at 540-41. Court-Appointed Receiver of Lancer Mgt. Group LLCI. Lauer, 2009 WL 800144 (S.D. H. Mar. 25, 2009) (Marra, J.). Thus, befo

not aware of any "special circumstances" that warrant staying all of the civil cases pending the "expiration" of the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant United States Attorne or CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on May 28, 2009, I electronically fi

f the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant United St

lent for fear of self incrimination in a parallel criminal proceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.' Id. (quoting Shell Oil Co. I Altina Assocs., Inc. , 866 F. Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. Fl. 1994)). As this Court has previously explained: The law regarding stays of civil actions

not aware of any "special circumstances" that warrant staying all of the civil cases pending the "expiration" of the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: -16- EFTA00222776 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on May 28, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing

f the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: -16- EFTA00222776

and not "merely the loss of the defendant's most `effective defense.' Securities & Exchange Comm.'. Incendy, 936 F. Supp. at 955 (S.D. Fl. 1996); Shell Oil Co., 866 F. Supp. at 540-41. Court-Appointed Receiver of Lancer Mgt. Group LLCI Lauer. 2009 WL 800144 (S.D. Fl. Mar. 25, 2009) (Marra, J.). Thus, befo

not aware of any "special circumstances" that warrant staying all of the civil cases pending the "expiration" of the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: loor CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on May 28, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with

f the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: loor CERTIFICATE O

lent for fear of self incrimination in a parallel criminal proceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.' Id. (quoting Shell Oil Co. I Altina Assocs., Inc. , 866 F. Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. Fl. 1994)). As this Court has previously explained: The law regarding stays of civil actions

not aware of any "special circumstances" that warrant staying all of the civil cases pending the "expiration" of the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: it appears from a brief review of some of Epstein's discovery responses that Epstein has simply made a blanket asserti

f the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: it appears from a b

lent for fear of self incrimination in a parallel criminal proceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.' Id. (quoting Shell Oil Co. I Altina Assocs., Inc. , 866 F. Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. Fl. 1994)). As this Court has previously explained: The law regarding stays of civil actions

not aware of any "special circumstances" that warrant staying all of the civil cases pending the "expiration" of the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant United States Attorney Florida Bar No. Ft. L 333 Telephone Facsimile: -16- EFTA00599157 Case 9:08-cv-

f the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant United St

lent for fear of self incrimination in a parallel criminal proceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.' Id. (quoting Shell Oil Co. v. Altina Assocs., Inc., 866 F. Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. Fl. 1994)). As this Court has previously explained: The law regarding stays of civil actions

cute Epstein, maintaining he committed no federal crimes. However, following a September 7, 2007 meeting with Epstein's defense team, U.S. Attorney Alexander R. Acosta" notified Epstein's team that "our Office [has] decided to proceed with the indictment." 3 Despite this statement, the former U.S. Attorney subseque

ediate" threat of future CVRA violations. Id. at 1328. Third, the court rejected Ms. Wild's requests for a victim-impact hearing and a meeting with Acosta on the grounds that it lacked jurisdiction over Acosta, that she had already had the opportunity to participate in an Epstein- related hearing in N

St. Amour, 886 F.3d 1009, 1013 (11th Cir. 2018) (quoting United States v. Fisher, 289 F.3d 1329, 1337-38 (11th Cir. 2002)); see also ? Robinson g Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337, 341, 117 S.Ct. 843, 136 L.Ed.2d 808 (1997) ("The plainness or ambiguity of WESTLAW @ 2021 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S.

ion” of the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/A. Marie Villafa

lent for fear of self incrimination in a parallel criminal proceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.’” Id. (quoting Shell Oil Co. v. Altina Assocs., Inc., 866 F. Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. Fl. 1994)). As this Court has previously explained: The law regarding stays of civil actions i