Epstein Secrets

o appear and provide testimony and evidence in accordance with the issued subpoenas at the next meeting of the Grand Jury. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant United States Attorne West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: Facsimile: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY

rand Jury. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant United

e a party fails to provide "sufficient facts to state with reasonable certainty that the privilege applies, the burden is not met." United States v. Blackburn , 538 F. Supp. 1376, 1382 (M.D. Fl. 1982) (citing Federal Trade Commission v. TRW Inc. , 628 F.2d 207, 213 (D.C. Cir. 1980); In re Katz , 623 F.2d

ork alleged that for years, Epstein paid some of his victims to recruit more underage girls," but "the charges came years after former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta resolved a sex-crimes case through a non-prosecution deal without notifying his alleged victims. A Justice Department investigation found Acosta sh

er Acosta resolved a sex-crimes case through a non-prosecution deal without notifying his alleged victims. A Justice Department investigation found Acosta showed 'poor judgment,' but Acosta said the review debunked allegations he cut a 'sweetheart deal.' CAPITOL VIOLENCE NEWS EFTA00148039 FBI Has Id

kburn (R- TN) "cited remarks from former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe...that China `poses the greatest threat to America today.' Blackburn asked Garland if he considered the Chinese Communist Party an `enemy' of the United States. `Well, I don't have the same familiarity with the intel

o appear and provide testimony and evidence in accordance with the issued subpoenas at the next meeting of the Grand Jury. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant United States Attorney Florida Bar No. 0018255 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 CERTIFICATE OF SERVI

rand Jury. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant United St

re a party fails to provide "sufficient facts to state with reasonable certainty that the privilege applies, the burden is not met." United States I Blackburn , 538 F. Supp. 1376, 1382 (M.D. Fl. 1982) (citing Federal Trade Commission I TRW Inc. , 628 F.2d 207, 213 (D.C. Cir. 1980); In re Katz , 623 F.2d 1

to "Egregious" Acosta/Epstein Plea Deal. The Miami Herald (12/30, 658K) editorializes that "the questionable actions of Miami's former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta in gifting a sweetheart federal plea deal to a Palm Beach multimillionaire and serial sexual predator have rightly come under fire." They "should a

r federal investigation, as we recommended in a recent editorial." Instead of "insisting on more- serious charges and a harsher sentence for Epstein, Acosta repeatedly caved to the demands of the sexual predator's high- powered lawyers and even worked with the legal team to limit the scope and publicity o

cidentally fired his shotgun while guarding the squared off perimeter. Schlumpf and the FBI at large were heavily involved in the investigation into Blackburn's heist and his role as a fugitive after escaping prison with his wife. Parents Of Alleged Hate Crime Victim In California Encourage Acts Of Kindne

Ile...LeneA nein Black srcbmck. Kornsparl & Stumpf EFTA00179082 U.S. Department Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY VIA FACSIMILE Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Fowler White Burnett 1395 Brickell Ave Fl 14 Miami Florida 33131-3300 Re: Jeffre

ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. AUGUST 3, 2007 PAGE 2 Please let us know your client's decision by no later than August 17. I have conferred with U.S. Attorney Acosta who has asked me to communicate that the two-year term of incarceration is a non-negotiable minimum to vindicate a federal interest, and, at this ti

e a party fails to provide "sufficient facts to state with reasonable certainty that the privilege applies, the burden is not met." United States v. Blackburn, 538 F. Supp. 1376, 1382 (M.D. Fl. 1982) (citing Federal Trade Commission v. TRW, Inc., 628 F.2d 207, 213 (D.C. Cir. 1980); In re Katz, 623 F.2d 12