Epstein Secrets

is not inconsistent with our belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to show that g violation of an enumeration secti

t that the plaintiff was injured, see United States v. Scheidt, supra (finding each to be a separate element) and the letter from Mr. Acosta to Mr. Starr, supra December 4, 2007 letter at p.2 which agrees that Mr. Epstein can contest the injury element under the NPA ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at tr

ROY BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK SCOTT A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMPF MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A.J. SHAPIRO JARED LOPEZ Jeff Sloman, Esq. United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4t

is not inconsistent with our belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to show that g violation of an enumeration secti

t that the plaintiff was injured, see United States I. Scheidt, supra (finding each to be a separate element) and the letter from Mr. Acosta to Mr. Starr, supra December 4, 2007 letter at p.2 which agrees that Mr. Epstein can contest the injury element under the NPA ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at tr

ROY BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK SCOTT A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMPF MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A.J. SHAPIRO JARED LOPEZ Jeff Sloman, Esq. United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4t

igations as you understand them under the NPA. As you know from past experience, and as Mr. Acosta previously acknowledged in letters to my partner Ken Starr (on December 4, 2007) and Lilly Ann Sanchez (on December 19, 2007), the language of 18 is "far from simple," and, in certain respects, subject to si

iously acknowledged in letters to my partner Ken Starr (on December 4, 2007) and Lilly Ann Sanchez (on D

United States Attorney By: 1 a .46vile ?Zia ada A. Marie Villafafia Assistant U.S. Attorney cc: Karen Atkinson, Esq. EFTA00194753 Roy BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK SCOTT A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMPF MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A J SHAPIRO JARED BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN STUMPF September 1, 2009 Jeffre

is not inconsistent with our belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to show that a violation of an enumeration secti

est that the plaintiff was injured, see United Stated, Scheidt, supra (finding each to be a separate element) and the letter from Mr. Acosta to Mr. Starr, supra December 4, 2007 letter at p.2 which agrees that Mr. Epstein can contest the injury element under the NPA ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at tr

H. Sloman, U.S. Attorney Robert K. Senior, Acting First Assistant U.S. Attorney Karen Atkinson, Chief, Northern Division EFTA00194763 Roy BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK Scow A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STumett MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A.J. SHAPIRO JARED BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN &STUMPF =RA = February 18, 201

obligations as you understand them under the NPA. As you know from past experience, and as Mr. Acostuaviously acknowledged in letters to my partner Ken Starr (on December 4, 2007) and Lilly Sanchez (on December 19, 2007), the language of 18 is "far from simple," and, in certain respects, subject to signi

iously acknowledged in letters to my partner Ken Starr (on December 4, 2007) and Lilly Sanchez (on Dece

Sincerely, Jeffrey H. Sloman Acting United States Attorney By: A e/a ..ifarkaa . Assistant U.S. Attorney cc: Esq. EFTA00183799 Roy BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK Score A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMPF MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK Manx A.J. SHAPIRO JARED BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN STUMPF September 1, 2009 , Esq

is not inconsistent with our belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to show that a violation of an enumeration secti

e singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convic

y cc: Jeffrey H. Sloman, U.S. Attorney Robert K. Senior, Acting First Assistant U.S. Attorney Chief, Northern Division EFTA00183809 ROY BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK SCOTT A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMPF MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEX MARK A.J. SHAPIRO JARED BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN &STUMPF -RA.- February 18, 2010

l power- houses who have worked for Epstein, including Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz and Bill Clin- ton investigator Kenneth EFTA00183073 Starr. Lefcourt is a past president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Epstein§ local defense attorney, Jack Goldberger, issued

ROY BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK SaYIT A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMPY? MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A.J.lAPIRO JARED BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN STUMPF P.A. May 18, 2010 VIA E

the tactics of the defense, and he called to praise our prosecutors for holding firm against the likes of Messrs. Black, Dershowitz, Leflcowitz and Starr. It was a proud moment. I also received calls or communications from Messrs. Dershowitz, Lefkowitz and Stan•. I had known all three individuals pre

dent in the Eleventh Circuit. $.0 Bonner v. City of Prichard, Ala , 661 F.2d 1206, 1207 (11th Cir. 1981). K&E 19439748.2 EFTA00180297 Rov BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK Scorer A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMPF MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A.J. SHAPIRO JARED LOPEZ BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN STUMPF t 7. September 1