Epstein Secrets

Jeffrey Criminal Files Attorneys Ken Starr Alan Dershowitz Jack Goldberger Jay Lefkowitz Marty Weinberg Darren Indyke Reid Weingarten Jerry Lefcourt (?) Roy Black Bruce Reinhart (?)

0304847 DKI FOURTH DRAWER: PALM BEACH LITIGATION -Non-Prosecution Agreement and Addendum -June 12, 2008 Draft DOJ Letter -Letter to Filip from Starr and Whitley (5-27-08) -March 28, 2008 Letter to DOJ -DOJ Submission (Summary) -DOJ Submission (Attachment Letter) -April 8, 2009 Submission to Ho

Alan Dershowitz Jack Goldberger Jay Lefkowitz Marty Weinberg Darren Indyke Reid Weingarten Jerry Lefcourt (?) Roy Black Bruce Reinhart (?) Bob Critton (?) Bill Riley (?) Chris Knight (?) Lily Sanchez (?) Guy Lewis (?) Mike Tein (?) What Should Be Pulled? DKI Drawer 1 PB CRIMINAL LITIGATION F

is not inconsistent with our belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to show that a violation of an enumeration secti

est that the plaintiff was injured, see United Stated, Scheidt, supra (finding each to be a separate element) and the letter from Mr. Acosta to Mr. Starr, supra December 4, 2007 letter at p.2 which agrees that Mr. Epstein can contest the injury element under the NPA ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at tr

g the amount of fees and costs properly owed to him by Mr. Epstein pursuant to the NPA. On February 16, 2010 Mr. Epstein's principal civil counsel Bob Critton advised Mr. Josefsberg in writing that he and Mr. Epstein would meet with Mr. Josefsberg on two occasions between now and March 1, 2010 to review M

is not inconsistent with our belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to show that a violation of an enumeration secti

e singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convic

g the amount of fees and costs properly owed to him by Mr. Epstein pursuant to the NPA. On February 16, 2010 Mr. Epstein's principal civil counsel Bob Critton advised Mr. Josefsberg in writing that he and Mr. Epstein would meet with Mr. Josefsberg on two occasions between now and March 1, 2010 to review M

the tactics of the defense, and he called to praise our prosecutors for holding firm against the likes of Messrs. Black, Dershowitz, Leflcowitz and Starr. It was a proud moment. I also received calls or communications from Messrs. Dershowitz, Lefkowitz and Stan•. I had known all three individuals pre

g the amount of fees and costs properly owed to him by Mr. Epstein pursuant to the NPA. On February 16, 2010 Mr. Epstein's principal civil counsel Bob Critton advised Mr. Josefsberg in writing that he and Mr. Epstein would meet with Mr. Josefsberg on two occasions between now and March 1, 2010 to review M