Epstein Secrets

o related to the indictment. On September 7, 2007, Epstein's attorneys met with the U.S. Attorney, Drew Oosterbaan, Jeff Sloman, John McMillan, and I. Ken Starr presented federalism arguments, urging deferral to state prosecution. When those arguments failed, Epstein's attorneys slated that he wanted to enga

RNEY 3 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-011819 EFTA00192865 U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530 June 23, 2008 Jay Lefkowitz„ Esq. Kenneth Starr, Esq. Kirkland and Ellis LLP 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Gentlemen: This Office has completed a thorough review of the U.S.

sterbaan, Jeff Sloman, John McMillan, and I. Ken Starr presented federalism arguments, urging deferral t

s they agreed to be bound by a Protective Order. Each victim (or her attorney) was provided with notice of the Court's ruling, and several executed the Protective Order and were provided with copies of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. From the beginning, Epstein has "vigorously defended" the suits, and has filed seve

a copy of the prosecution memo related to the indictment. On September 7, 2007, Epstein's attorneys met with the U.S. Attorney, Jeff Sloman, , and I. Ken Starr presented federalism arguments, urging deferral to state prosecution. When those arguments failed, Epstein's attorneys stated that he wanted to enga

th the U.S. Attorney, Jeff Sloman, , and I. Ken Starr presented federalism arguments, urging deferral t

s they agreed to be bound by a Protective Order. Each victim (or her attorney) was provided with notice of the Court's ruling, and several executed the Protective Order and were provided with copies of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. From the beginning, Epstein has "vigorously defended" the suits, and has filed seve

delivery of any such letter, however, it should only be made by a third party service, not by law enforcement agents. Finally, as you know, Judge Starr has requested a meeting with Assistant Attorney General Fisher to address what we believe is the unprecedented nature of the § 2255 component of th

.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida R. ALEXANDER ACas-rn UNITED STATES ATTORNEY DELIVERY EY FACSIMILE Kenneth W. Starr, Esq Kirkland & Ellis LLP 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Re: Jeffrey Eckstein Dear Mr. Starr: 99 N.E. 4 Ewen Afloat Ft 33132

tters that were sent to Jane Doe #1. 12. In accordance with the Court's instructions at the status conference of August 14, 2008 and the terms of the Protective Order entered by the Court on August 21, 2008, EFTA00234651 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2008 Page 4 of 4 beginni

delivery of any such letter, however, it should only be made by a third party service, not by law enforcement agents. Finally, as you know, Judge Starr has requested a meeting with Assistant Attorney General Fisher to address what we believe is the unprecedented nature of the § 2255 component of th

.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida R. ALEXANDER ACas-rn UNITED STATES ATTORNEY DELIVERY EY FACSIMILE Kenneth W. Starr, Esq Kirkland & Ellis LLP 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Re: Jeffrey Eckstein Dear Mr. Starr: 99 N.E. 4 Ewen Afloat Ft 33132

tters that were sent to Jane Doe #1. 12. In accordance with the Court's instructions at the status conference of August 14, 2008 and the terms of the Protective Order entered by the Court on August 21, 2008, EFTA00213129 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2008 Page 4 of 4 beginni

was dissatisfied with the NPA, “we stand ready to unwind the Agreement” and proceed to trial. Shortly thereafter, Acosta informed defense counsel Starr by letter that he had directed prosecutors “not to issue victim notification letters until this Friday [December 7] at 5 p.m., to provide you with t

d by a Protective Order entered by the Court. If [the victim] would like to review the Agreement, please let me know, and I will forward a copy of the Protective Order for her signature. The government shared draft versions of the September letter with Epstein’s counsel and responded to criticism of the content o

e 1973 PBS documentary `An American Family,' the Starr Report, the memoir craze, blogging, and social me

mmon law right of access, or of the more robust First Amendment right to access certain judicial documents. Id. at 119-20. It is a given accepted by the Protective Order that the trial and all trial documents are accessible and public absent special circumstances. *8 1121 II3IUnder the common law approach, once a do