Epstein Secrets

t. 1, 2007. ABC News later reported that federal charges “could carry more substantial prison time. Now, Epstein’s high-powered lawyers, including Kenneth Starr, . . . may try to get him out of registering as a sex offender . . . .” Scott Michels, “Money Manager Said to Plan to Plead Guilty to Prostitution

of Hearing (Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Dec. 7, 2007). 151 In a meeting with Acosta and Sloman on November 21, 2007, Lefkowitz informed them that Starr had placed a call to Fisher. 95 not recall for OPR the substance of his conversation with Starr, other than that it was likely about Epst

, the legal prowess, if you will, of the attorneys [ ] [became] something to consider. . . . . I think that the ability of Alan Dershowitz and Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz to convince Alex Acosta that I didn’t know what I was talking [about] also, all came into play. So I think there were a number

a prosecutor 195 The Ashcroft Memo was issued before the Supreme Court decided United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), which struck down the provision of the federal sentencing statute that required federal district judges to impose a sentence

ern District of Florida From: Date: Kenneth W. Starr Rpm vet os: December 7, 2007 34 Message Fax

680-8400. To: lion. R. Alexander Acosta Company: Fax N: Direct N: United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida From: Date: Kenneth W. Starr Rpm vet os: December 7, 2007 34 Message Fax N: Direct SI: EFTA00214706 12/07/07 FRI 15:31 FAX 1 213 680 6500 KIRKLAND&F.I.LIS III' 00 2

lve this prototypical fact pattern. See, e.g., United States v. Mono, 364 F.3d 1300 (11th Cir. 2004), vacated for further consideration in light of Booker, 125 S. Ct. 1338 (2006), opinion reinstated by, 144 Fed. Appx. 804 (2005); United States v. Omega, 363 F.3d 1093 (1Is Cir. 2004); United States v.

ern District of Florida From: Date: Kenneth W. Starr Rues votes: December 7, 2007 34 Fax N: Dire

IATELY AT: To: lion. R. Alexander Acosta Company: Fax N: Direct N: United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida From: Date: Kenneth W. Starr Rues votes: December 7, 2007 34 Fax N: Direct SI: Message EFTA00221325 12. 07.07 FRI 13:31 FAX 1 KIRKIAND&F.I.LIS 0 0 2 KIRKLAND & ELLI

olve this prototypical fact pattern. See, e.g.. United States,. Mono, 364 F.3d 1300 (11th Cir. 2004), vacated for further consideration in light of Booker, 125 S. Ct. 1338 (2006), oninforueinSigMl_h% 144 Fed. Appx. 804 (2005); United States Gana, 363 F.3d 1093 (11th Cir. 2004); United States'. Miranda

United States Attorney's Office Hon. R. Alexander Acosta Southern District of Florida Fax 0: (305) 530-6444 Wrest (305) 961-9100 From: Date: Kenneth W. Starr Pages *town December 7, 2007 34 (213) 680-8500 (213) 680-8440 Fax 0: Direct II: Message: EFTA00176206 12/07/07 FRI 15:31 FAX 1 213 680 85

Wrest (305) 961-9100 From: Date: Kenneth W. Starr Pages *town December 7, 2007 34 (213) 680-85

lve this prototypical fact pattern. See. e.g., United States Morton. 364 F.3d 1300 (11th Cir. 2004), vacated for further consideration in light of Booker, 125 S. Ct. 1338 (2006), opinion reinstated by, 144 Fed. Appx. 804 (2005); United States I. Orrega, 363 F.3d 1093 (11i° Cir. 2004); United States I.

ourts, until its duty is fully performed. Prout Starr, 188 U.S. 537, 544 (23 Sup.Ct. 398, 47 L. . 584)

ic sentence stipulation that did not exceed the statutory maximum and was not contingent upon the Guidelines, remand is not ired to comport with Booker and (United States Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073( Cir.2005) (en bane ."); see also United States Cieslowski, 410 F.3d 353, 364 (7th Cir.200 ("A sentence

im Conde, Tyler Green, Felise Thorpe Moll, Justin Starr, and Stewart Young; and especially to my wife Tri

lly meaningless unless a victim can provide a basis for recalculating the Guidelines or departing or varying from them. 74? 236 See United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). 237 See, e.g., United States v. Wilson, 350 F. Supp. 2d 910, 912 (D. Utah 2005) (giving "heavy weight" to Guidelines recomme