Epstein Secrets

ral investigation of Mr. Epstein. He asked to meet with her and she stated that she believed such a meeting woilaremature. In December, Sanchez and Gerald Lefcourt again contacted AUSA to set a meeting. AUSA requested documents in advance of such a meeting, but the request was refused. Ms. Sanchez then contac

the request was refused. Ms. Sanchez then contacted AUSA Andrew—, who agreed to meet with iiihez fcourt. On February 1, 2007, Ms. Sanchez and Mr. Lefcourt met with AUSA an as well as a member ofthe Federal Bureau of Investigation, presented defense counsel's view of the case, and promised a willingne

espite the fact that the indictment was ready for presentation to the grand jury. In the interim, AUSA and the investigators met with the Chief of the Child Exploitation Section, Drew Oosterbaan, to review, yet again, the evidence and legal theories of prosecution. Chief Oosterbaan strongly supported the indictment and even

ion of Mr. Epstein. He asked to meet with her and she stated that she believed such a meeting would be premature. In December, Lilly Ann Sanchez and Gerald Lefcourt again contacted AUSA Villafafia to set a meeting. AUSA Villafafia requested documents in advance of such a meeting, but the request was refused. Ms.

n advance of such a meeting, but the request was refused. Ms. Sanchez then contacted AUSA Andrew Lourie, who agreed to meet with Ms. Sanchez and Mr. Lefcourt. On February 1, 2007, Ms. Sanchez and Mr. Lefcourt met with AUSAs Lourie and Villafafia, as well as a member of the Federal Bureau of Investigation

fact that the indictment was ready for presentation to the grand jury. In the interim, AUSA Villafafia and the investigators met with the Chief of the Child Exploitation Section, Drew Oosterbaan, to review, yet again, the evidence and legal theories of prosecution. Chief Oosterbaan strongly supported the indictment and even

ictment. One of those cases was argued by Gerald Lefcourt — one of Epstein's attorneys. For those reasons,

rge number of uncharged overt acts, those uncharged acts can serve as a variance from/amendment to the Indictment. One of those cases was argued by Gerald Lefcourt — one of Epstein's attorneys. For those reasons, I have kept most of the overt acts from the original indictment (excluding those related to the Ja

completed. At the time I supersede, the overt acts can be reduced. The counts have been reorganized based upon discussions with Myesha Braden from the Child Exploitation Section. She believes that our strongest counts are the child sex trafficking violations (18 U.S.C. § 1591). I have moved those counts forward in the indic

nvestigation of Mr. Epstein. He asked to meet with her and she stated that she believed such a meeting wapeiremature. In December? S[ in Sanchez and Gerald Lefcourt again contacted AUSA to set a meeting. AUSA requested documents in advance of such a meeting, but the request was refused. Ms. Sanchez then contac

ed documents in advance of such a meeting, but the request was refused. Ms. Sanchez then contacted AUSA who agreed to meet with Ms. Sanchez and Mr. Lefcourt. On February 1, 2007, Ms. Sanchez and Mr. Lefcourt met with AUSAs and as well as a member of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, presented defen

7, 2007, despite the fact that the indictment was ready for presentation to the grand jury. In the interim AUSA investigators met with the Chief of the Child Exploitation Section, again, the evidence and legal theories of prosecution. Chief strongly supported the indictment and even offered to join the trial team and provid

ing the federal investigation of Mr. Epstein. He asked to Tetttifith.her sir stated that she believed such a meeting would be In December, and Gerald Lefcourt again contacted AUSA to set a meeting. AUSA requested documents in advance of such a meeting, but the request was refused. Ms. Sanchez then contac

sted documents in advance of such a meeting, but the request was refused. Ms. Sanchez then contacted AUSA ME who agreed to meet with Mishez and Mr. Lefcourt. On February 1, 2007, Ms. Sanchez and Mr. Lefcourt met with AUSAs and a, as well as a member o f the Federal Bureau of Investigation, presented d

fact that the indictment was ready for presentation to the grand jury. In the interim, AUSA Villafafia and the investigators met with the Chief of the Child Exploitation Section, Drew Oosterbaan, to review, yet again, the evidence and legal theories of prosecution. Chief Oosterbaan strongly supported the indictment and even

connected and the videotapes were gone. Nonetheless, the search did recover some evidence of value, 'During a meeting, Epstein's current attorneys, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, admitted that attorney Roy Black instructed Epstein to have the CPUs removed, but they insisted that those instructions were

ng a meeting, Epstein's current attorneys, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, admitted that attorney Ro

tigation are completed. At the time I supersede, the overt acts can be reduced. The counts have been reorganized based upon discussions with from the Child Exploitation Section. She believes that our strongest counts are the child sex trafficking violations (18 U.S.C. § 1591). I have moved those counts forward in the indic