fact that the indictment was ready for presentation to the grand jury. In the interim, AUSA Villafafia and the investigators met with the Chief of the Child Exploitation Section, Drew Oosterbaan, to review, yet again, the evidence and legal theories of prosecution. Chief Oosterbaan strongly supported the indictment and even

espite the fact that the indictment was ready for presentation to the grand jury. In the interim, AUSA and the investigators met with the Chief of the Child Exploitation Section, Drew Oosterbaan, to review, yet again, the evidence and legal theories of prosecution. Chief Oosterbaan strongly supported the indictment and even

7, 2007, despite the fact that the indictment was ready for presentation to the grand jury. In the interim AUSA investigators met with the Chief of the Child Exploitation Section, again, the evidence and legal theories of prosecution. Chief strongly supported the indictment and even offered to join the trial team and provid

fact that the indictment was ready for presentation to the grand jury. In the interim, AUSA Villafafia and the investigators met with the Chief of the Child Exploitation Section, Drew Oosterbaan, to review, yet again, the evidence and legal theories of prosecution. Chief Oosterbaan strongly supported the indictment and even

completed. At the time I supersede, the overt acts can be reduced. The counts have been reorganized based upon discussions with Myesha Braden from the Child Exploitation Section. She believes that our strongest counts are the child sex trafficking violations (18 U.S.C. § 1591). I have moved those counts forward in the indic

tigation are completed. At the time I supersede, the overt acts can be reduced. The counts have been reorganized based upon discussions with from the Child Exploitation Section. She believes that our strongest counts are the child sex trafficking violations (18 U.S.C. § 1591). I have moved those counts forward in the indic