Epstein Secrets

Mau MencheLjeff Sloman, mid Marie Villakula 27 5/15/2007 Transcript of Kuyrkendall Testimony 28 5/22/07- 5/24/07 Emails between Andrew Laurie, Gerald Lel-court, Man Mencheljeff Sloman, Marie Villafaiia, Lilly Ann Sanchez, and Karen Atkinson regarding second meeting with counsel for Epstein 29 5/22/2007 T

ainst federal prosecution. 34 7/13/2007 Letter from Roy Black to Marie Villa' la with handwritten attorney Lourie notes 35 7/25/2007 latter from Gerald l.efrourt and Alan Dershowia to Matthew Menchel arguing that no charge can or should be made under 18 U.S.C. S 2422(b). 36 7/26/2007 Email from Marie ViIla

f the individuals who have accepted Epstein's offer of payment for representation and the names of their attorneys. 2/1/2007 A. Marie Villafafia Gerald B. Lefcourt Talking points and documents for 2/1/07 meeting 4 2/5/2007 A. Marie Villafatia Gerald B. Lefcourt Production of debit/credit card statement r

inson A. Marie Villafaila Draft of email to be sent to Sloman and Menchel stating that Villafatia disagrees with promising to have a meeting with Lefcourt or any of Epstein's other attorneys. Believes the prior meeting disclosed prosecution strategy and holding another meeting will disclose even more.

hez, counsel to Mr. Epstein. Ms. Sanchez had formerly served as Deputy Chief in the Major Crimes Section at the USAO while Mr. Menchel was Chief of Major Crimes. As discussed below, on July 26, 2007, Criminal Chief Menchel announced to the investigative team that U.S. Attorney Acosta had decided to offer a

rald Lefcourt provided written arguments for why Epstein should not be charged federal) Exhibit 32). The following day, Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt, and Lilly M presented their arguments to FAUSA and Chief Sil her supervisor, and I also attended (Exhibit 5). At some point during the meeting,

that, prior to this investigation, I had ever prepared' request for 6001 immunity, so I was researching the process. The meetingwith Ms. and Mr. Lefcourt was set for February 1, 2007. As noted above, despite Ms. statements of Epstein's willina to cooperate, she complained that my document requests w

matter with Lilly counsel to Mr. Epstein. Ms. had formerly served as Deputy Chief in the Major Crimes Section at the USAO while Mr. was Chief of Major Crimes. As discussed below, on July 26, 2007, Criminal Chief announced to the investigative team that U.S. Attorney Acosta had decided to offer I two-yea

s of that conflict of interest. Another prominent attorney who began representing Epstein during the state investigation was New York City attorney Gerald Lefcourt, 4 Epstein’s background has been extensively researched and reported in the media. See, e.g., L

ypassed Villafaña and phoned Lourie, with whom she had worked when she was an AUSA, to press for a meeting. Lourie agreed to meet with Sanchez and Lefcourt. Lourie explained to Villafaña that Sanchez was concerned that federal charges were “imminent,” wanted to meet with the USAO and “make a pitch,” an

ised him that she also represented Epstein. Sanchez was employed by the USAO from 2000 to September 2005 and had been a Deputy Chief of the USAO’s Major Crimes section at the time Menchel was the Chief. According to Sloman’s contemporaneous email recounting the conversation, when Sanchez indicated to him