Epstein Secrets

FREY EPSTEIN, DEFENDANT 8 EFTA00176618 GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT 9 EFTA00176619

understandings. Date: By: R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Date: By: Date: By: JEFFREY EPSTEIN, DEFENDANT 8 EFTA00176618 GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT 9 EFTA00176619 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs.

nds that the amount of restitution owed to each victim will be determined at or before sentencing. 6. This Plea Agreement is governed, in pail, by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C). The parties have agreed that the defendant's sentence imposed by the Court shall be two (2) yews' imprisonment to be followe

EFFREY EPSTEIN, DEFENDANT Date: By: GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT 7 EFTA00194611

ations, or understandings. Date: By: R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Date: By: JEFFREY EPSTEIN, DEFENDANT Date: By: GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT 7 EFTA00194611 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs.

nds that the amount of restitution owed to each victim will be determined at or before sentencing. 6. This Plea Agreement is governed, in part, by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(e)(1)(C). The parties have agreed that the defendant's sentence imposed by the Court shall be two (2) years' imprisonment to be follow

ct Deliberative process 6(e) Attorney-Client Privilege ■ 7/13/2007 letter from to with handwritten attorney (Lourie) notes; ■ 6/2 /2 I from Gerald Lefcourt Matt Menchal , and with handwritten attorney • ■ 6/25/2007 email fro to Matt Menchel and entitled "Thoughts on Lefcourt's letter" Handwrit

ttorney (Lourie) notes; ■ 6/2 /2 I from Gerald Lefcourt Matt Menchal , and with handwritten attorney

r, and subject to any other conditions that it directs — of a grand-jury matter: (i) preliminarily to or in connection with a judicial proceeding." Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) provides that the traditional rule of grand jury secrecy may be placed aside under certain circumstances to allow for disclosure. S

cument 354-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/14/2016 Page 4 of 18 5. Admitted. 6. The Respondent admits that, as reflected in a July 6, 2007, letter from Gerald Lefcourt and Alan Dershowitz to four members of the USAO-SDFL, Alan Dershowitz was among the defense lawyers who were representing Jeffrey Epstein and who m

reflected in a July 6, 2007, letter from Gerald Lefcourt and Alan Dershowitz to four members of the USAO-S

vernment." See supra at 1-3. The Respondent also objects to Requests No. 26(a)-26(e) as calling for responses that are protected from disclosure by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e), by the law enforcement investigative privilege, and by the work product doctrine. Notwithstanding the foregoing objection, the Resp

ictment. One of those cases was argued by Gerald Lefcourt — one of Epstein's attorneys. For those reasons,

rge number of uncharged overt acts, those uncharged acts can serve as a variance from/amendment to the Indictment. One of those cases was argued by Gerald Lefcourt — one of Epstein's attorneys. For those reasons, I have kept most of the overt acts from the original indictment (excluding those related to the Ja

the offender to the custody of the United States Marshal for proceedings under Section 3148. In this instance, judicial officers are also bound by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 46. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 46(e) provides that "[t]he court must declare the bail forfeited if a condition of the bond is b

As you put it, your group has a "combined 250 years experience" to my fourteen. The agreement itself was signed by Mr. Epstein, Ms. Sanchez, and Mr. Lcfcourt, whose experience speaks for itself. You and I spent hours negotiating the terms, including when to use "a" versus "the" and other minutiae. When y

15 EFTA00799620 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLED Docket 06/02/2017 Page 17 of 176 1264, 1307 (11th Cir. 2012). Likewise, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) requires confidentiality for persons subject to a grand jury investigation. My recommendations to opposing counsel to limit any ple

tering; and that it would be “virtually impossible to comply” with four separate state registration requirements. A few minutes later, Sanchez sent Lefcourt’s phone number to Lourie “in case you want to speak to him directly.” In another email sent less than two hours later, Sanchez told Lourie she was

rough a plea agreement, including a plea that calls for the imposition of a specific, predetermined sentence. USAM §§ 9-27.330, 9-27.400; see also Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1). 206 OPR also considered whether Acosta, Sloman, Menchel, Lourie, or Villafa