Epstein Secrets

of felony solicitation of prostitufion,f1t6-i to which Epstein pleaded not guilty in August 2006.1271 Epstein's defense lawyers included Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt, Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz, and former U.S. Solicitor General Ken Starr_ ['W.-Linguist Steven Pinker also laffrau Fnqtain EFTA

tein's defense lawyers included Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt, Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz, a

d leader of One Nation, a right-wingailist political party.Nianson has represented Queensland in the Australian Senate since 2016 Federal pection. Hanson ran a fish and chip shop before entering politics in 1994 as a member of Ipskvich City Council in her home state. She joined the Liberal Party of A

lishment of One Nation 1998 re-election campaign Time in office 2001 election campaign Rattnergate scandal Senator Pauline Hanson , • • 1 it Hanson in 2017 Federal President of Pauline Hanson's One Nation. incumbent Assumed office 29 November 2014111 Vice President Ian Nelson Preceded by

MARIE VILLAFARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY GERALD LEFCOURT, BSQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANC

d agrees to comply with them. R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Dated: Dated: Dated: By: A. MARIE VILLAFARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY GERALD LEFCOURT, BSQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANCM3Z, BSQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN Page 7 of 7 EFTA00076091 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document

inforcing the presumption of innocence, our justice system's bedrock, there is a "strong presumption against [pretrial] detention." United States v. Hanson, 613 F. Supp. 2d 85, 87 (D.D.C. 2009). A person facing trial generally must be released so long as some "condition, or combination of conditions ..

on or any other criminal matter, which several courts have observed is a critical factor in evaluating whether pretrial release is appropriate. See Hanson, 613 F. Supp. 2d at 90 ("In this case, ... there is no strong circumstantial evidence indicating that Mrs. Hanson intends to flee the United States"

d agrees to comply with them. R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Dated: Dated: Dated: By: A. MARIE VILLAFARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY GERALD LEFCOURT, BSQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANCM3Z, BSQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN Page 7 of 7 EFTA00095894 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document

MARIE VILLAFARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY GERALD LEFCOURT, BSQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANC

inforcing the presumption of innocence, our justice system's bedrock, there is a "strong presumption against [pretrial] detention." United States v. Hanson, 613 F. Supp. 2d 85, 87 (D.D.C. 2009). A person facing trial generally must be released so long as some "condition, or combination of conditions ..

on or any other criminal matter, which several courts have observed is a critical factor in evaluating whether pretrial release is appropriate. See Hanson, 613 F. Supp. 2d at 90 ("In this case, ... there is no strong circumstantial evidence indicating that Mrs. Hanson intends to flee the United States"

that he register as a sex offender. In a letter drafted. but not sent. to U.S. Attorney Alexander Costa and obtained by Page Six. Epstein's lawyer. Gerald Lefcourt, writes, "Doing so will have a profound impact [on Epstein] both immediately and forever after. Not only will he be restricted to a wholly inapprop

office would not comment for this story.) Epstein had spoken with Manhattan criminal attorney Gerald Lefcourt to review his options. Within days, Lefcourt brought in Palm Beach criminal attorney Jack Goldberger who just happened to know state attorney Krischer before he became a prosecutor. But not on

ant, Alice COMBAT) Green, Linda Eco Crime) Green Lynn CC C) Greene, Mary el 7) Greene, Mary CC C) Guelli, Sam VETO) Hall, Monique CC PI) Hanson, Lisa Juv O) Harris, Alison Admin) Harris, Wyetha Fel U) Harrison, Linda Juv K) Hartwell, Kristina DOVE-TO) Harvey, Lauren DOVE-TD) Harve

w York, NY 10022 WIRty represented by Gerald B. Lefcourt Law Office Gerald B. Lefcourt 148 East 78th Str

When determining whether these minimum contacts are present, it is the quality and not necessarily the quantity of contacts that is determinative. Hanson' Denclda, 357 U.S. 235, 253 (1958). Further, because the Plaintiff claims that specific jurisdiction exists in this case, the relevant contacts ar