Epstein Secrets

esented Jeffrey Epstein concerning the criminal investigation conducted by the U.S. Attorney's Office and the resolution of that investigation 20. Gerald B. Lefcourt P.C. Mr. Lefcourt represented Jeffrey Epstein concerning the criminal investigation conducted by the U.S. Attorney's Office and the resolution of t

rning the criminal investigation conducted by the U.S. Attorney's Office and the resolution of that investigation 20. Gerald B. Lefcourt P.C. Mr. Lefcourt represented Jeffrey Epstein concerning the criminal investigation conducted by the U.S. Attorney's Office and the resolution of that investigation

n the West Palm Beach office of the U.S. Attorney's Office, and supervised portions of the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. 8. assisted AUSA Villafana during the criminal investigation of.leffrey Epstein. 9. In his revious capacity as Deputy Chief of the Criminal Division, U.S. Attorney's Office

tigation of Epstein. He asked to meet with her but she said that she believed such a meeting would be premature. In December, Lilly Ann Sanchez and Gerald Lefcourt again contacted AUSA Villafana to set a meeting. In advance of such a meeting, AUSA Villafana requested documents but that request was refused. Ms.

t request was refused. Ms. Sanchez then contacted Deputy Chief of the Criminal Division, Andrew Laurie, who agreed to meet with Ms. Sanchez and Mr. Lefcourt. On February 1, 2007, Ms. Sanchez and Mr. Lefcourt met with AUSAs Lourie and Villafana, as well as a member of the FBI, and presented defense counse

component was involved in the process. For example, at the end of 2006, former SDFL U.S. Attorney and EOUSA Executive Director Guy Lewis contacted AUSA Villafana when he learned that she was handling the federal investigation of Epstein. He asked to meet with her but she said that she believed such a meeting

tigation of Epstein. He asked to meet with her but she said that she believed such a meeting would be premature. In December, Lilly Ann Sanchez and Gerald Lefcourt again contacted AUSA Villafana to set a meeting. In advance of such a meeting, AUSA Villafana requested documents but that request was refused. Ms.

t request was refused. Ms. Sanchez then contacted Deputy Chief of the Criminal Division, Andrew Lourie, who agreed to meet with Ms. Sanchez and Mr. Lefcourt. On February 1, 2007, Ms. Sanchez and Mr. Lefcourt met with AUSAs Lourie and Villafana, as well as a member of the FBI, and presented defense counse

component was involved in the process. For example, at the end of 2006, former SDFL U.S. Attorney and EOUSA Executive Director Guy Lewis contacted AUSA Villafana when he learned that she was handling the federal investigation of Epstein. He asked to meet with her but she said that she believed such a meeting

, please do so through AUSA Villafana, and, in her absence, AUSA Atkinson. On September 24, 2007, your client, Jeffrey Epstein, in consultation with Gerald Lefcourt, Esq. and Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq., as well as numerous other nationally-renowned lawyers, including but not limited to Harvard Law Professor Alan Der

ent, Jeffrey Epstein, in consultation with Gerald Lefcourt, Esq. and Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq., as well as num

atter, will be handled by AUSA Marie Villafana and/or her supervisor, Karen Atkinson, so he does not intend to respond to your e-mail or calls unless AUSA Villafana and/or her supetvisors advise him otherwise. Furthermore, you make reference to “our July 8 deadline.” Respectfully, the United _ States.Attorney’s

alleged conduct. See, e.g., Letter from Gerald B. Lefcourt to a EFTA00299028 USAO-SDFL, June 25, 2007 (a

the many contradictory sworn statements and inconsistencies in the various witness accounts of Mr. Epstein's alleged conduct. See, e.g., Letter from Gerald B. Lefcourt to a EFTA00299028 USAO-SDFL, June 25, 2007 (attached as Exhibit 1). Those presentations also included detailed statutory analysis and discussion

r legal positions, the risk of litigation, and the government's desire to minimize damaging impeachment evidence of its witnesses. As summarized by AUSA Villafana, the USAO-SDFL made the decision to enter the NPA out of a desire to obtain a guaranteed sentence of incarceration, the equivalent of uncontested r

tigation of Epstein. He asked to meet with her but she said that she believed such a meeting would be premature. In December, Lilly Ann Sanchez and Gerald Lefcourt again contacted AUSA Villafana to set a meeting. In advance of such a meeting, AUSA Villafana requested documents but that request was refused. Ms.

t request was refused. Ms. Sanchez then contacted Deputy Chief of the Criminal Division, Andrew Lourie, who agreed to meet with Ms. Sanchez and Mr. Lefcourt. On February 1, 2007, Ms. Sanchez and Mr. Lefcourt met with AUSAs Lourie and Villafana, as well as a member of the FBI, and presented defense counse

component was involved in the process. For example, at the end of 2006, former SDFL U.S. Attorney and EOUSA Executive Director Guy Lewis contacted AUSA Villafana when he learned that she was handling the federal investigation of Epstein. He asked to meet with her but she said that she believed such a meeting

please do so through AUSA Villafana, and, in her absence, AUSA Atkinson. On September 24, 2007, your client, Jeffrey Epstein, in consultation with Gerald Lefcoun, Esq. and Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq., as well as numerous other nationally-renowned lawyers, including but not limited to Harvard Law Professor Alan D

tter, will be handled by AUSA Marie Villafana and/or her supervisor, Karen Atkinson, so he does not intend to respond to your e-mail or calls unless AUSA Villafana and/or her supervisors advise him otherwise. Furthermore, you make reference to "our July 8 deadline." Respectfully, the United States Attorney's O

n of the parties’ Non Prosecution Agreement—and issued yet another subpoena seeking evidence in this case. See Tab 19, Subpoena to | In the subpoena, AUSA Villafana directs MMMto appear on July 1, 2008 to give testimony and produce documents to FGJ 07-103 West Palm Beach. The attachment to the subpoena seeks docu

3, August 16, 2007 Letter from M. Villafana to G. Lefcourt (“In other words, if the sex offense case is reso