Epstein Secrets

GUEZ was then contacted by attorney JACK GOLDBERGER(phonetic) concerning legal representation. RODRIGUEZ advised that he declined representation by GOLDBERGER. He did not alert the attorney to the existence of the black bound book or handwritten notes that agents seized on November 3, 2009. RODRIGUEZ was

ately ten (10) months ago, in ear y 2009. After receiving the subpoena and alerting EPSTEIN's o anization, RODRIGUEZ was then contacted by attorney JACK OLDBERGER( honetic) concerning legal representation. RODRIGUEZ advised t t e declined representation by GOLDBERGER. He did not alert the attorney to the exis

e district where an investigation is being conducted for making a consensual interception in a specific investigation. a federal judge, a member of the Executive Branch at Level IV or — previous 2 years. ._—...- Governor, or Attorn .t torney General of f. any state or tenitory, or a and the offense investigated

ne Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400 250 Australian Ave S. West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5015 Re: Subpoenas to JEGE. Inc. and Hyperion Air. Inc. Dear Mr. Goldberger: It was a pleasure speaking with you today. As we discussed, the deadlines for complying with the subpoenas to JEGE, Inc. and Hyperion Air, Inc. ha

here is no support for CEOS's view that the courts or a jury should ultimately decide whether a "novel" construction of the law is correct. Instead, the Executive Branch itself has a non-delegable obligation not to exceed its authority; the power of other branches to check or remedy such usurpation does not legitimi

terrorism, which basic principles of customary international law, a considerable range of judicial decisions, and the determinations of Congress and the Executive Branch all establish as acts that violate international law for purposes of establishing an ATS claim. While plaintiffs perhaps did not adequately allege a

were publicly known to have been involved in terrorist activities and to be affiliated with al-Qaeda. See Wyatt, 785 F. Supp. 2d at 647-48; see also Goldberg v. UBS AG, 660 F. Supp. 2d 410, 428-29 (E.D.N.Y. 2009) (finding that plaintiffs had “sufficiently pled that the defendant consciously disregarded the