Epstein Secrets

ing or recommending to another party any =ransaction or matter addressed herein. Click=Here for More Information Alan S. Halperin I =artner Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP 1285 Avenue of the Americas I New York, NY 10019-6064 From: =nbsp To: =nbsp; Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.

unication =including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be =sed, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue =ode or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any =ransaction or matter addressed herein. Click=Here for More Information Ala

Click=Here for More Information Jessica D. Soojian I =ssociate Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP venue h Americas New York. NY I www.paulweiss.com <http://www.paulweiss.com/> From: =nbsp; "Ada Clapp" To: =nbs

unication =including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be =sed, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue =ode or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any =ransaction or matter addressed herein. Click=Here for More Information Ala

e question. It was not in the Fifth Circuit decision. I am pulling up the Tax Court decision and will let you know. Alan S. Halperin Partner Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 9:07 AM To: Halperin, Alan S

Court") to review and eventually eliminate the federal estate tax deficiency assessed against the Estate by Respondent-Appellee. the Commissioner of Internal Revenue ('the Commissioner"). That deficiency resulted solely from the Commissiona's disallowance of the "fractionalownership discount" applied by the Esta

greement); In re Arnett, 804 F.2d 1200 (1111 Cw.1986) (plea agreement); Rowe v. Griffin, 676 F.2d 624 (11th Cir. 1982) (immunity) United States v. Weiss, 599 F.2d 780, 737 (6th Cir.1979) (immunity) (Tuttle, J.) ('lle protect the voluntariness of a waiver of fifth amendment rights, where a plea, co

d Slates. 34$ U.S. 121. 75 S.Ct. 127, 99 LEd. 150 (1954) (approving net worth method of reconstructing taxable income under predecessor of current Internal Revenue Code section 446). 5. In a separate motion before the district court Harvey sought to have the court exclude these documents which the government