Epstein Secrets

rt for the Southern District of New York (Robert W. Sweet, Judge) denying their respective motions t

t court's decision whether to discharge or retain a Receiver); see also FTC. v. Standard Fin. Mgmt. Corp., 830 F.2d 404, 409 (1st Cir. 1987) (citing Federal Rule of Evidence 401's "having any tendency" definition of relevance in determining whether documents were "judicial documents"). 1' As we explain below, th

, petition for cert. filed,No. 02-11197, — U.S.L.W. ---- (U.S. June 9, 2003), where the defendant ha

See United States Soto-Beniquez, 356 F.3d I, 52 (1st Cir.2004) ("Any possible prejudice to [defendant] from the government's non-compliance [with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32] was cured by the district court's two-week continuance to give defense counsel an ad- equate opportunity to respondlo the gove

titled by (Name) * —- “* cA.* . -a r.A' \ <'.X ' -W. »=*. Trmo> Juveroie Dtsposibdn'r>~ , ' r? « -14»

as evidence. See Fed! R. Crim. P. 11(f) (“The admissibility or inadmissibility of a plea, a plea discussion, and any related statement is governed by Federal Rule of Evidence 410.”). In any case, the victims could have been impeached regarding the possibility' of their obtaining monetary damages through either a ci