Epstein Secrets

sephsberg for this assignment. In fact, when I told you of Judge Davis’s selection during our meeting last Wednesday, November 21°, you and Professor Dershowitz seemed very comfortable, and certainly not surprised, with the selection. Podhurst and Josephsberg are no strangers to nearly the entire Epstein defe

serve this function. After all, Mr. Epstein is also represented by Dean Kenneth Starr, Martin Weinberg, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt, Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz, Lily Ann Sanchez, and Guy Lewis. That being said, the Southern District of Florida will only renew the offer to extend the current deadline if you

our meeting last Wednesday, November 21°, you and Professor Dershowitz seemed very comfortable, and certainly not surpri

rg, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt, Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz, Lily Ann Sanchez, and Guy Lewis. Tha

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012671 2] 004/006 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX ioe 05/16/08 FRI 11:09 FAX 80 novel as to implicate the so-called “‘clear statement rule,” the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect

5:01:37 Incident Report Program: CMS301L Case No 1-05-000368 (Continued) Miami. Mr Fronstin further stated Epstein had originally called Mr. Dershorwitz in Boston, who recommended Roy Black in Miami, who asked Mr. Fronstin to assist. I informed him that if and when any charges would be presented I w

evening hours. I received a package from Atty. Guy Fronstin, which was hand delivered at the police station. Within the package, was a letter from Alan Dershowitz, and two www.myspace.com profiles. The profiles were that of and MySpace.com is a social networking service that allows members to create unique

69 of 89 late: 7/19/06 PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT "lire: 15:01:37 Page: 68 Incident Report Program: CMS301L ase No 1-05-000368 contact Mr Dershowitz. (Continued) On January 3,'2006, I received a telephone call from ASA Weiss who informed me that she made telephone contact with Mr? Dershowitz. S

e station. Within the package, was a letter from Alan Dershowitz, and two www.myspace.com profiles. The

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-39 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 4 of 6 so novel as to implicate the so-called "dear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. =may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect to 1

Lefcourt). 6/26/2007--Meeting (US: , DEF: Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Sanchez).

erald Lefcourt). 6/26/2007--Meeting (US: , DEF: Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly

3 JEFFREY EPSTEIN Timeline-Summary 2/20/2007--Meeting (US: and 'I'll' DEF: Lilly Sanchez and Gerald Lefcourt). 6/26/2007--Meeting (US: , DEF: Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Sanchez). 7/26/2007--Meeting (US: (conference call), and ). 7/31/2007--Meeting (US: and DEF: Roy Black,

ot be 2 EFTA01718491 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX 05/18/08 FRI 11:09 FAX @004/006 1004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect

[email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P

Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2009 Page 8 of 36 B. Masha's Law Does Not Apply To This Case. The presumption against retroactivity and the Ex Post Facto clause preclude application of Masha's Law in this case, where the alleged predicate conduct was completed before 2006. 1. Congress Dld Not Intend

looseleaf service updated annually). 3A Charles Alan Wright, Federa 1 Practice and Procedure SS 761-7

ct future behavior *1039 and that the question is so vague as to be meaning- less. That calls into play the concept our Court of Appeals applied to the Ex Post Facto r Clause (albeit in a different con t from the present one) in United States Sutton, 521 F.2d 1385, 1390- (7th ir.1975) (quoting United State

jphesearcylaw.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiff Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P

ports, cited above herein, consistently referring to the presumptive minimum damages amount under §2255 as "punishment" or "penalties? According to the Ex Post Facto doctrine, although §2255 is labeled a "civil remedy," such label is not dispositive; "if the effect of the statute is to impose punishment that is